Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33658027›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2021

Evaluation and optimisation of direct transesterification methods for the assessment of lipid accumulation in oleaginous filamentous fungi.

Anne Marie Langseter, Simona Dzurendova, Volha Shapaval, Achim Kohler, Dag Ekeberg, Boris Zimmermann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Wood Degradation byJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Lipid Readjustment inBiomolecules · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anne Marie LangseterFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Postbox 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway.
Simona DzurendovaFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Postbox 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway.
Volha ShapavalFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Postbox 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway.
Achim KohlerFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Postbox 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway.
Dag EkebergFaculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway.
Boris ZimmermannFaculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Postbox 5003, 1432, Ås, Norway. boris.zimmermann@nmbu.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5046-520X
Norwegian University of Life Sciences · NO

Funding

Norges Forskningsråd 257622Norges Forskningsråd 268305Norges Forskningsråd 302543Norges Forskningsråd 305215Norges Forskningsråd 309220
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOleaginous filamentous fungi can accumulate large amount of cellular lipids and potentially serve as a major source of oleochemicals for food, feed, chemical, pharmaceutical, and transport industries. Transesterification of microbial oils is an essential step in microbial lipid production at both laboratory and industrial scale. Direct transesterification can considerably reduce costs, increase sample throughput and improve lipid yields (in particular fatty acid methyl esters, FAMEs). There is a need for the assessment of the direct transesterification methods on a biomass of filamentous fungi due to their unique properties, specifically resilient cell wall and wide range of lipid content and composition. In this study we have evaluated and optimised three common direct transesterification methods and assessed their suitability for processing of fungal biomass.

resultsThe methods, based on hydrochloric acid (Lewis method), sulphuric acid (Wahlen method), and acetyl chloride (Lepage method), were evaluated on six different strains of Mucoromycota fungi by using different internal standards for gas chromatography measurements. Moreover, Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy was used for the detection of residual lipids in the biomass after the transesterification reaction/extraction, while transesterification efficiency was evaluated by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The results show that the majority of lipids, in particular triglycerides, were extracted for all methods, though several methods had substandard transesterification yields. Lewis method, optimised with respect to solvent to co-solvent ratio and reaction time, as well as Lepage method, offer precise estimate of FAME-based lipids in fungal biomass.

conclusionsThe results show that Lepage and Lewis methods are suitable for lipid analysis of oleaginous filamentous fungi. The significant difference in lipid yields results, obtained by optimised and standard Lewis methods, indicates that some of the previously reported lipid yields for oleaginous filamentous fungi must be corrected upwards. The study demonstrates value of biomass monitoring by FTIR, importance of optimal solvent to co-solvent ratio, as well as careful selection and implementation of internal standards for gas chromatography.

Indexed as

BiomassChromatography, GasEsterificationFungiLipid MetabolismLipidsSolventsSpectroscopy, Fourier Transform InfraredTriglyceridesLipidsSolventsTriglyceridesBiodieselBiofuelIn situ transesterificationMethyl estersOleaginous microorganisms

Identifiers

PMID33658027
PMCPMC7931520
OpenAlexW3133832106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.