Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33657931›Full record

SynthesisTrauma, violence & abuse2022

Sexual Violence Against Persons With Disabilities: A Meta-Analysis.

Amylee Mailhot Amborski, Eve-Line Bussières, Marie-Pier Vaillancourt-Morel, Christian C Joyal

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Trauma, violence & abuse, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
10.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 141 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sexual and Reproductive Health Care Receipt Among Female Adolescents and Young Adults With Disability in the United States, 2011-2019.The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Reproductive Education and Sexual Abuse Among Individuals With Spina Bifida: A Mixed Methods Study.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Amylee Mailhot AmborskiDepartment of Psychology, 14847Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada.
Eve-Line BussièresDepartment of Psychology, 14847Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada.
Marie-Pier Vaillancourt-MorelDepartment of Psychology, 14847Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada.
Christian C JoyalDepartment of Psychology, 14847Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Québec, Canada.
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing number of large-scale studies suggest that people with disabilities are at greater risk of sexual victimization than nondisabled individuals. However, certain results are inconsistent and whether potential moderators explain this variability in previous findings remain to be considered. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the magnitude of the difference in risk of being sexually victimized based on the presence of a disability. An additional objective was to evaluate the relative influence of gender, age, type of disability, type of sexual violence, and relationship with the perpetrator on the association between the presence of a disability and sexual victimization. Studies were searched using pertinent databases and retained if they included a group with a disability, provided data that quantify the occurrence of abuse, indicated the type of sexual violence, and was published between 1970 and 2018 in French or English. A total of 68 studies, allowing 84 independent samples and 12,427 participants, were included. Individuals with disabilities were at significantly higher risk of sexual victimization than persons without disabilities (odds ratio = 2.27). The risk of sexual victimization among individuals with a disability was significantly higher in adult participants compared with the risk in minor participants. Sensory impairment was the type of disability associated with the highest risk of sexual victimization. Odds of sexual victimization among individuals with a disability were significantly higher in African countries compared with all others, and odds in Western Europe were significantly lower than in the United States. No significant differences emerged across eras.

Indexed as

BullyingCrime VictimsPersons with DisabilitiesSex OffensesAdultHumansPrevalenceUnited Statesdisabilitymeta-analysissexual violencevictimization

Identifiers

PMID33657931
PMCPMC9425723
OpenAlexW3135336627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.