Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33657924›Full record

ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2021

Glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma: differentiation using MRI derived first-order texture analysis - a machine learning study.

Sarv Priya, Caitlin Ward, Thomas Locke, Neetu Soni, Ravishankar Pillenahalli Maheshwarappa, Varun Monga, Amit Agarwal, Girish Bathla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarv PriyaDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2442-1902
Caitlin WardDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Iowa, USA.
Thomas LockeDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, USA.
Neetu SoniDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, USA.
Ravishankar Pillenahalli MaheshwarappaDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9602-612X
Varun MongaDepartment of Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, USA.
Amit AgarwalDepartment of Radiology, University of South Western Medical Center, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9139-8007
Girish BathlaDepartment of Radiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of multiple machine learning classifier models derived from first-order histogram texture parameters extracted from T1-weighted contrast-enhanced images in differentiating glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma.

methodsRetrospective study with 97 glioblastoma and 46 primary central nervous system lymphoma patients. Thirty-six different combinations of classifier models and feature selection techniques were evaluated. Five-fold nested cross-validation was performed. Model performance was assessed for whole tumour and largest single slice using receiver operating characteristic curve.

resultsThe cross-validated model performance was relatively similar for the top performing models for both whole tumour and largest single slice (area under the curve 0.909-0.924). However, there was a considerable difference between the worst performing model (logistic regression with full feature set, area under the curve 0.737) and the highest performing model for whole tumour (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model with correlation filter, area under the curve 0.924). For single slice, the multilayer perceptron model with correlation filter had the highest performance (area under the curve 0.914). No significant difference was seen between the diagnostic performance of the top performing model for both whole tumour and largest single slice.

conclusionsT1 contrast-enhanced derived first-order texture analysis can differentiate between glioblastoma and primary central nervous system lymphoma with good diagnostic performance. The machine learning performance can vary significantly depending on the model and feature selection methods. Largest single slice and whole tumour analysis show comparable diagnostic performance.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaLymphomaCentral Nervous SystemDiagnosis, DifferentialHumansMachine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective Studiesglioblastomasmachine learningMRIprimary CNS lymphomatexture/radiomics

Identifiers

PMID33657924
PMCPMC8447821

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.