ArticleJournal of proteome research2021
RawBeans: A Simple, Vendor-Independent, Raw-Data Quality-Control Tool.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Standard operating procedure combined with comprehensive quality control system for multiple LC-MS platforms urinary proteomics.Nature communications · 2025Article
- PeakQC: A Software Tool for Omics-Agnostic Automated Quality Control of Mass Spectrometry Data.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2024Article
- A Framework for Quality Control in Quantitative Proteomics.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- Reference Materials for Improving Reliability of Multiomics Profiling.Phenomics (Cham, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Quality Control in the Mass Spectrometry Proteomics Core: A Practical Primer.Journal of biomolecular techniques : JBT · 2024Article
- Comprehensive Overview of Bottom-Up Proteomics Using Mass Spectrometry.ACS measurement science au · 2024Review
- A framework for quality control in quantitative proteomics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Optimization of Mass Spectrometric Parameters in Data Dependent Acquisition for Untargeted Metabolomics on the Basis of Putative Assignments.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2023Article
- A Sensitive and Controlled Data-Independent Acquisition Method for Proteomic Analysis of Cell Therapies.Journal of proteome research · 2022Article
- Online Nanoflow Two-Dimension Comprehensive Active Modulation Reversed Phase-Reversed Phase Liquid Chromatography High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry for Metaproteomics of Environmental and Microbiome Samples.Journal of proteome research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Every laboratory performing mass-spectrometry-based proteomics strives to generate high-quality data. Among the many factors that impact the outcome of any experiment in proteomics is the LC-MS system performance, which should be monitored within each specific experiment and also long term. This process is termed quality control (QC). We present an easy-to-use tool that rapidly produces a visual, HTML-based report that includes the key parameters needed to monitor the LC-MS system performance, with a focus on monitoring the performance within an experiment. The tool, named RawBeans, generates a report for individual files or for a set of samples from a whole experiment. We anticipate that it will help proteomics users and experts evaluate raw data quality independent of data processing. The tool is available at https://bitbucket.org/incpm/prot-qc/downloads. The mass-spectrometry proteomics data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange Consortium via the PRIDE partner repository with the data set identifier PXD022816.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.