Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33657451›Full record

ReviewActa biomaterialia2021

Natural medicine delivery from biomedical devices to treat bone disorders: A review.

Susmita Bose, Naboneeta Sarkar, Dishary Banerjee

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. [Updates on Bone Grafts and Substitutes].Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025
    Article
  5. Updates on Bone Grafts and Substitutes.Revista brasileira de ortopedia · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Bone Healing via Carvacrol and Curcumin Nanoparticle on 3D Printed Scaffolds.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Natural medicine delivery from 3D printed bone substitutes.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2024
    Review
  17. Multifunctional polydopamine - ZnBiomaterials advances · 2023
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Susmita BoseW. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States. Electronic address: sbose@wsu.edu.
Naboneeta SarkarW. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States.
Dishary BanerjeeW. M. Keck Biomedical Materials Research Laboratory, School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States.
Washington State University · US

Funding

3D Printed Calcium Phosphate Scaffolds with Natural Medicinal Compounds for Dental ApplicationsR01DE029204 · NIDCR · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BOSE, SUSMITA · 2020 to 2024
$1.7M
Surface modified metal implants using doped hydroxyapatiteR01AR066361 · NIAMS · WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BOSE, SUSMITA · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR066361NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE029204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With an increasing life expectancy and aging population, orthopedic defects and bone graft surgeries are increasing in global prevalence. Research to date has advanced the understanding of bone biology and defect repair mechanism, leading to a marked success in the development of synthetic bone substitutes. Yet, the quest for functionalized bone grafts prompted the researchers to find a viable alternative that regulates cellular activity and supports bone regeneration and healing process without causing serious side-effects. Recently, researchers have introduced natural medicinal compounds (NMCs) in bone scaffold that enables them to release at a desirable rate, maintains a sustained release allowing sufficient time for tissue in-growth, and guides bone regeneration process with minimized risk of tissue toxicity. According to World Health Organization (WHO), NMCs are gaining popularity in western countries for the last two decades and are being used by 80% of the population worldwide. Compared to synthetic drugs, NMCs have a broader range of safety window and thus suitable for prolonged localized delivery for bone regeneration. There is limited literature focusing on the integration of bone grafts and natural medicines that provides detailed scientific evidences on NMCs, their toxic limits and particular application in bone tissue engineering, which could guide the researchers to develop functionalized implants for various bone disorders. This review will discuss the emerging trend of NMC delivery from bone grafts, including 3D-printed structures and surface-modified implants, highlighting the significance and potential of NMCs for bone health, guiding future paths toward the development of an ideal bone tissue engineering scaffold. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: To date, additive manufacturing technology provids us with many advanced patient specific or defect specific bone constructs exhibiting three-dimensional, well-defined microstructure with interconnected porous networks for defect-repair applications. However, an ideal scaffold should also be able to supply biological signals that actively guide tissue regeneration while simultaneously preventing post-implantation complications. Natural biomolecules are gaining popularity in tissue engineering since they possess a safer, effective approach compared to synthetic drugs. The integration of bone scaffolds and natural biomolecules exploits the advantages of customized, multi-functional bone implants to provide localized delivery of biochemical signals in a controlled manner. This review presents an overview of bone scaffolds as delivery systems for natural biomolecules, which may provide prominent advancement in bone development and improve defect-healing caused by various musculoskeletal disorders.

Indexed as

Bone SubstitutesTissue ScaffoldsAgedBone and BonesBone RegenerationHumansTissue EngineeringBone SubstitutesBiomaterialsBone disordersBone tissue engineeringDrug deliveryNatural medicinal compoundsVitamins

Identifiers

PMID33657451
PMCPMC8247456
OpenAlexW3135181652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.