Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33657105›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

The potential for histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors as cestocidal drugs.

Hugo Rolando Vaca, Ana María Celentano, María Agustina Toscanini, Tino Heimburg, Ehab Ghazy, Patrik Zeyen, Alexander-Thomas Hauser, Guilherme Oliveira, María Celina Elissondo, Manfred Jung and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Extracts and Terpenoids fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Hugo Rolando VacaInstituto de Microbiología y Parasitología Médica, Universidad de Buenos Aires-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (IMPaM, UBA-CONICET). Facultad de Medicina, Paraguay 2155, piso 13, C1121ABG, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-5395-8402
Ana María CelentanoInstituto de Microbiología y Parasitología Médica, Universidad de Buenos Aires-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (IMPaM, UBA-CONICET). Facultad de Medicina, Paraguay 2155, piso 13, C1121ABG, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-7564-0908
María Agustina ToscaniniInstituto de Microbiología y Parasitología Médica, Universidad de Buenos Aires-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (IMPaM, UBA-CONICET). Facultad de Medicina, Paraguay 2155, piso 13, C1121ABG, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0001-9431-7794
Tino HeimburgInstitute of Pharmacy, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle(Saale), Germany.
Ehab GhazyInstitute of Pharmacy, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle(Saale), Germany.
Patrik ZeyenInstitute of Pharmacy, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle(Saale), Germany.
Alexander-Thomas HauserInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Guilherme OliveiraInstituto Tecnológico Vale, Belém, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-0054-3438
María Celina ElissondoLaboratorio de Zoonosis Parasitarias, Instituto de Investigaciones en Producción, Sanidad y Ambiente (IIPROSAM), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales (FCEyN), Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata (UNMdP), Mar del Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-5210-8721
Manfred JungInstitute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Wolfgang SipplInstitute of Pharmacy, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle(Saale), Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5985-9261
Federico CamiciaInstituto de Microbiología y Parasitología Médica, Universidad de Buenos Aires-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (IMPaM, UBA-CONICET). Facultad de Medicina, Paraguay 2155, piso 13, C1121ABG, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0003-1406-0357
Mara Cecilia RosenzvitInstituto de Microbiología y Parasitología Médica, Universidad de Buenos Aires-Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (IMPaM, UBA-CONICET). Facultad de Medicina, Paraguay 2155, piso 13, C1121ABG, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-5271-6321
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARMartin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DEVale Technological Institute · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEchinococcosis and cysticercosis are neglected tropical diseases caused by cestode parasites (family Taeniidae). Not only there is a small number of approved anthelmintics for the treatment of these cestodiases, but also some of them are not highly effective against larval stages, such that identifying novel drug targets and their associated compounds is critical. Histone deacetylase (HDAC) enzymes are validated drug targets in cancers and other diseases, and have been gaining relevance for developing new potential anti-parasitic treatments in the last years. Here, we present the anthelmintic profile for a panel of recently developed HDAC inhibitors against the model cestode Mesocestoides vogae (syn. M. corti). METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsPhenotypic screening was performed on M. vogae by motility measurements and optical microscopic observations. Some HDAC inhibitors showed potent anthelmintic activities; three of them -entinostat, TH65, and TH92- had pronounced anthelmintic effects, reducing parasite viability by ~100% at concentrations of ≤ 20 μM. These compounds were selected for further characterization and showed anthelmintic effects in the micromolar range and in a time- and dose-dependent manner. Moreover, these compounds induced major alterations on the morphology and ultrastructural features of M. vogae. The potencies of these compounds were higher than albendazole and the anthelmintic effects were irreversible. Additionally, we evaluated pairwise drug combinations of these HDAC inhibitors and albendazole. The results suggested a positive interaction in the anthelmintic effect for individual pairs of compounds. Due to the maximum dose approved for entinostat, adjustments in the dose regime and/or combinations with currently-used anthelmintic drugs are needed, and the selectivity of TH65 and TH92 towards parasite targets should be assessed. CONCLUSION, SIGNIFICANCE: The results presented here suggest that HDAC inhibitors represent novel and potent drug candidates against cestodes and pave the way to understanding the roles of HDACs in these parasites.

Indexed as

AlbendazoleAnimalsAnthelminticsBenzamidesCestode InfectionsHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsLarvaMesocestoidesPyridinesAlbendazoleAnthelminticsBenzamidesentinostatHistone Deacetylase InhibitorsPyridines

Identifiers

PMID33657105
PMCPMC7959350
OpenAlexW3134041908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.