Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33657104›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2021

Mapping suitability for Buruli ulcer at fine spatial scales across Africa: A modelling study.

Hope Simpson, Earnest Njih Tabah, Richard O Phillips, Michael Frimpong, Issaka Maman, Edwin Ampadu, Joseph Timothy, Paul Saunderson, Rachel L Pullan, Jorge Cano

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Hope SimpsonLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2956-5342
Earnest Njih TabahNational Yaws, Leishmaniasis, Leprosy and Buruli ulcer Control Programme, Cameroon.ORCID 0000-0002-3796-2241
Richard O PhillipsSchool of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0001-8992-0222
Michael FrimpongSchool of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID 0000-0003-1901-6793
Issaka MamanNational Reference Laboratory for Buruli Ulcer Disease in Togo, Ecole Supérieure des Techniques Biologiques et Alimentaires (ESTBA), Laboratoire des Sciences Biologiques et des Substances Bioactives, Université de Lomé, Lomé, Togo.
Edwin AmpaduNational Buruli Ulcer Control Program, Ghana Health Service, Accra, Ghana.
Joseph TimothyLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-6699-0620
Paul SaundersonAccelerating Integrated Management (AIM) Initiative, Accra, Ghana.
Rachel L PullanLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Jorge CanoLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-9864-5058
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBKwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology · GHCentre Pasteur du Cameroun · CMGhana Health Service · GHUniversity of Lomé · TG

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/J01477X/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buruli ulcer (BU) is a disabling and stigmatising neglected tropical disease (NTD). Its distribution and burden are unknown because of underdiagnosis and underreporting. It is caused by Mycobacterium ulcerans, an environmental pathogen whose environmental niche and transmission routes are not fully understood. The main control strategy is active surveillance to promote early treatment and thus limit morbidity, but these activities are mostly restricted to well-known endemic areas. A better understanding of environmental suitability for the bacterium and disease could inform targeted surveillance, and advance understanding of the ecology and burden of BU. We used previously compiled point-level datasets of BU and M. ulcerans occurrence, evidence for BU occurrence within national and sub-national areas, and a suite of relevant environmental covariates in a distribution modelling framework. We fitted relationships between BU and M. ulcerans occurrence and environmental predictors by applying regression and machine learning based algorithms, combined in an ensemble model to characterise the optimal ecological niche for the disease and bacterium across Africa at a resolution of 5km x 5km. Proximity to waterbodies was the strongest predictor of suitability for BU, followed potential evapotranspiration. The strongest predictors of suitability for M. ulcerans were deforestation and potential evapotranspiration. We identified patchy foci of suitability throughout West and Central Africa, including areas with no previous evidence of the disease. Predicted suitability for M. ulcerans was wider but overlapping with that of BU. The estimated population living in areas predicted suitable for the bacterium and disease was 46.1 million. These maps could be used to inform burden estimations and case searches which would generate a more complete understanding of the spatial distribution of BU in Africa, and may guide control programmes to identify cases beyond the well-known endemic areas.

Indexed as

Mycobacterium ulceransAfricaBuruli UlcerClimateEcosystemHumansModels, Theoretical

Identifiers

PMID33657104
PMCPMC7959670
OpenAlexW3133797515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.