Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33656948›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2021

Individual differences in proprioception predict the extent of implicit sensorimotor adaptation.

Jonathan S Tsay, Hyosub E Kim, Darius E Parvin, Alissa R Stover, Richard B Ivry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Benefits of Dual-Tasking on Implicit Sensorimotor Adaptation.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  7. Implicit adaptation's effect on sensorimotor and motor confidence.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Sensorimotor confidence during explicit motor adaptation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Indirect feedback hinders explicit sensorimotor adaptation.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Motor adaptation is reduced by symbolic compared to sensory feedback.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan S TsayDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, California.ORCID 0000-0002-3992-9023
Hyosub E KimDepartment of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware.ORCID 0000-0003-0109-593X
Darius E ParvinDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, California.ORCID 0000-0001-5278-2970
Alissa R StoverDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Richard B IvryDepartment of Psychology, University of California, Berkeley, California.

Funding

MULTICENTER CAREER DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR PHYSICAL AND OCCUPATIONAL THERAPYK12HD055931 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI HAYES, MARCIE HARRIS · 2007 to 2021
$12.7M
Human Cerebellar Function in Multiple Task DomainsR35NS116883 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI RICHARD IVRY · 2020 to 2026
$5.3M
Specifying the constraints on cerebellar dependent sensorimotor adaptationR01NS105839 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI IVRY, RICHARD · 2018 to 2019
$709k
HHS | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01 NS1058389National Science Foundation (NSF) M3X1934650NICHD NIH HHS K12 HD055931NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS105839NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS116883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have revealed an upper bound in motor adaptation, beyond which other learning systems may be recruited. The factors determining this upper bound are poorly understood. The multisensory integration hypothesis states that this limit arises from opposing responses to visual and proprioceptive feedback. As individuals adapt to a visual perturbation, they experience an increasing proprioceptive error in the opposite direction, and the upper bound is the point where these two error signals reach an equilibrium. Assuming that visual and proprioceptive feedback are weighted according to their variability, there should be a correlation between proprioceptive variability and the limits of adaptation. Alternatively, the proprioceptive realignment hypothesis states that the upper bound arises when the (visually biased) sensed hand position realigns with the expected sensed position (target). When a visuo-proprioceptive discrepancy is introduced, the sensed hand position is biased toward the visual cursor, and the adaptive system counteracts this discrepancy by driving the hand away from the target. This hypothesis predicts a correlation between the size of the proprioceptive shift and the upper bound of adaptation. We tested these two hypotheses by considering natural variation in proprioception and motor adaptation across individuals. We observed a modest, yet reliable correlation between the upper bound of adaptation with

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdolescentAdultFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansIndividualityLearningMaleProprioceptionPsychomotor PerformanceYoung Adultcross-sensory calibrationerror-based learningmotor learningproprioceptionsensorimotor adaptation

Identifiers

PMID33656948
PMCPMC8282225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.