Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33656708›Full record

ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2021

Difference of refractive status before and after cycloplegic refraction: the Lhasa Childhood Eye Study.

Lei Li, Jing Fu, Weiwei Chen, Zhaojun Meng, Yunyun Sun, Han Su, Yao Yao, Wei Dai

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the agreement of non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction in children.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lei LiStrabismus and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory Ophthalmology Department of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Capital Medical University, No.1, Dong Jiao Min Xiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Jing FuStrabismus and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory Ophthalmology Department of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Capital Medical University, No.1, Dong Jiao Min Xiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China. fu_jing@126.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2939-9479
Weiwei ChenStrabismus and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory Ophthalmology Department of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Capital Medical University, No.1, Dong Jiao Min Xiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Zhaojun MengStrabismus and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory Ophthalmology Department of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Capital Medical University, No.1, Dong Jiao Min Xiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Yunyun SunStrabismus and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory Ophthalmology Department of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Capital Medical University, No.1, Dong Jiao Min Xiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Han SuStrabismus and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory Ophthalmology Department of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Capital Medical University, No.1, Dong Jiao Min Xiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Yao YaoStrabismus and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory Ophthalmology Department of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Capital Medical University, No.1, Dong Jiao Min Xiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Wei DaiStrabismus and Pediatric Ophthalmology, Beijing Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences Key Laboratory Ophthalmology Department of Beijing Tongren Hospital, Beijing Tongren Eye Center, Capital Medical University, No.1, Dong Jiao Min Xiang Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, People's Republic of China.
Beijing Tongren Hospital · CN

Funding

High-level health technicians in Beijing health system- Backbone of discipline 2015-3-023Special Topic of Clinical Application Research with Capital Characteristics Z171100001017066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the differences between cycloplegic and noncycloplegic refraction as well as associated factors in grade one students of primary schools, and explore the effectiveness of noncycloplegic refraction for refractive error screening. STUDY

designCross-sectional study.

methodsA school-based study of 1856 students was conducted in Lhasa, Tibetan Plateau, China. Cycloplegia was achieved with two drops of 1% cyclopentolate and 1 drop of Mydrin P at a 5-min interval. Autorefraction was performed under both cycloplegic and noncycloplegic conditions. Bland-Altman analysis, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, univariate and multiple linear regression models were used for analysis.

resultsOf the 1856 children enrolled, 1830 (98.60%) completed all procedures. The average age was 6.83 ± 0.46 years. 965 (52.73%) children were boys and 1737 (94.92%) were Tibetan. Overall, there was a significant difference between cycloplegic and noncycloplegic SE of 0.90 ± 0.76D (P < 0.001). However, the intra-class coefficient correlation (ICC) for cylinder between these two methods was high (ICC = 0.941, 95% CI, 0.935-0.946). Larger differences between cycloplegic and noncycloplegic SE were associated with hyperopic RE and higher cylindrical value (P < 0.001). The prevalence of myopia, emmetropia and hyperopia with and without cycloplegia was (3.93% vs 14.59%), (9.95% vs 45.8%) and (86.21% vs 39.56%), respectively. Myopia, emmetropia and hyperopia based on noncycloplegic refraction was defined as SE ≤ - 0.625D, - 0.625 < SE ≤ 0D, and SE > 0D, respectively.

conclusionsLack of cycloplegia leads to underestimation of hyperopia, with overestimation of myopia and emmetropia. Larger hyperopic refraction exhibited greater difference between cycloplegic and noncycloplegic refraction.

Indexed as

MydriaticsRefractive ErrorsChildCross-Sectional StudiesCyclopentolateHumansMaleRefraction, OcularCyclopentolateMydriaticsChildrenCycloplegicRefractive status

Identifiers

PMID33656708
OpenAlexW3135383879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.