Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33656696›Full record

ArticleUpdates in surgery2021

Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: cost-effectiveness analysis of trend modifications of the technique.

Benedetto Ielpo, Javier Nuñez, Valentina Ferri, Jesus Silva, Yolanda Quijano, Emilio Vicente, Riccardo Caruso, Antonio Giuliani, Gianluca Pellino

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Updates in surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Benedetto Ielpo *General Surgery Department, Leon University Hospital, HPB Unit, Calle Altos de Nava S/N, 24001, Leon, Spain. ielpo.b@gmail.com.
Javier Nuñez *IVEC (Instituto de Validación de La Eficiencia Clínica), Fundación de Investigación HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain.
Valentina FerriGeneral Surgery Department, HM Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University of Madrid, Sanchinarro University Hospital, Calle Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain.
Jesus SilvaGeneral Surgery Department, Leon University Hospital, HPB Unit, Calle Altos de Nava S/N, 24001, Leon, Spain.
Yolanda QuijanoGeneral Surgery Department, HM Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University of Madrid, Sanchinarro University Hospital, Calle Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain.
Emilio VicenteGeneral Surgery Department, HM Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University of Madrid, Sanchinarro University Hospital, Calle Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain.
Riccardo CarusoGeneral Surgery Department, HM Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University of Madrid, Sanchinarro University Hospital, Calle Oña 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain.
Antonio GiulianiAOR San Carlo, UOC di Chirurgia Generale e d'Urgenza, Potenza, Italy.
Gianluca PellinoDepartment of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, Università Degli Studi Della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8322-6421
Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro · ESHospital de León · ESHM Hospitales · ESOspedale San Carlo · ITUniversity of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different modifications of the trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) repair of groin hernia. Data were collected prospectively for all consecutive patients who underwent TAPP unilateral inguinal hernia repair between November 2017 and March 2019, and who completed a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. Costs and quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained were collected. Three TAPP variations were assessed: mesh fixation and peritoneal closure with staples (group 1); mesh fixation with fibrin glue and peritoneal closure with sutures (group 2); and mesh fixation and peritoneal closure with fibrin glue (group 3). A matched group of open repairs was established. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and main intra-operative and post-operative outcomes were assessed. Overall 120 patients were included (group 1 n = 31; group 2 n = 27; group 3 n = 33; open group: 29). Operative time was shorter for groups 2 and 3, and the main post-operative outcomes were similar. The overall mean total cost of the open group (1185.95€) was lower compared with the laparoscopic group (group 1: 1682.39; group 2: 1538.54€; group 3: 1510.1€) (p = 0.026). However, the mean ICERs of groups 2 and 3 were significantly higher compared with group 1 (p = 0.021) and the open group (p = 0.032). At simulations analysis, the probability of cost-effectiveness was 33.32%, 36.26%, and 36.7% in TAPP groups 1, 2, and 3. In the long term, laparoscopic repair of groin hernia is cost-effective compared with open surgery. The use of fibrin glue for mesh fixation and/or for closing the peritoneum is the most cost-effective option and shortens operative times.

Indexed as

Hernia, InguinalLaparoscopyCost-Benefit AnalysisFibrin Tissue AdhesiveHerniorrhaphyHumansSurgical MeshTreatment OutcomeFibrin Tissue AdhesiveFibrin glueInguinal herniaLaparoscopyTAPP

Identifiers

PMID33656696
OpenAlexW3135741561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.