ReviewInfectious diseases and therapy2021
Impact of the 2014 American Academy of Pediatrics Policy on RSV Hospitalization in Preterm Infants in the United States.
Review in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Respiratory Syncytial Virus Burden in Premature Infants: The Role of Season With and Without RSV Immunoprophylaxis in a Multicenter Study.Pediatric pulmonology · 2025Article
- Fc-mediated functions of nirsevimab complement direct respiratory syncytial virus neutralization but are not required for optimal prophylactic protection.Frontiers in immunology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite being a leading cause of hospitalization due to lower respiratory tract infections, the treatment of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection is primarily supportive. Palivizumab is the only licensed immunoprophylaxis (IP) available for preventing severe RSV infection in high-risk populations including ≤ 35 weeks' gestational age (wGA) infants and children with chronic lung disease of prematurity or congenital heart disease. The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) has published its IP recommendations since the approval of palivizumab. In 2014, the AAP stopped recommending RSV IP in 29-34 wGA infants without comorbidities and stated that RSV hospitalization (RSVH) risk in otherwise healthy ≥ 29 wGA infants and term infants was similar. Since then, experts in the field have debated the appropriateness of the 2014 policy change, and several real-world evidence studies at the national and regional levels in the US have examined the impact of the AAP policy on 29-34 wGA infants. Overall, these studies showed a significant decline in RSV IP use and a concurrent increase in RSVH risk among 29-34 wGA infants relative to term infants in the seasons after the 2014 policy change. A similar decrease in IP use and increase in RSVH risk was also observed among < 29 wGA infants relative to term infants after the 2014 policy change. This decrease could be an unintended consequence as < 29 wGA infants are an in-policy population recommended to receive RSV IP. According to the National Perinatal Association, strong evidence exists to support the use of RSV IP in all ≤ 32 wGA and 32-35 wGA infants with risk factors such as attending day care, having ≥ 1 school-aged siblings, twin or greater multiple gestation, younger age, and exposure to parental smoking. Until new preventive and treatment options become available, palivizumab can help prevent and mitigate RSV disease burden among high-risk preterm infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.