Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33656130›Full record

ArticleSao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina

Long-term results from modified sphincteroplasty in patients with traumatic sphincter injury: a retrospective study.

Mustafa Berkesoglu, Tahsin Colak, Mehmet Ozgur Turkmenoglu, Ismet Han, Ilter Kirmizi, Gokhan Giray Akgul, Ihsan Gunduz

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Comparison of obstetric and non-obstetric anal sphincter injuries: Surgical outcomes and Jorge Wexner score analysis.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mustafa BerkesogluMD. Assistant Professor, Department of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Mersin University Hospital, Mersin, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5850-5592
Tahsin ColakMD. Professor, Department of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, School of Medicine, Mersin University Hospital, Mersin, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7253-5608
Mehmet Ozgur TurkmenogluMD. Associate Professor, Department of General Surgery, Division of Colorectal Surgery, School of Medicine, Mersin University Hospital, Mersin, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3461-6909
Ismet HanMD. Surgical Gastroenterologist, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Trabzon Training and Research Hospital, Trabzon, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5556-7202
Ilter KirmiziMD. Surgical Gastroenterologist, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Aydin State Hospital, Aydin, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0132-6892
Gokhan Giray AkgulMD. Surgical Oncologist, Department of Surgical Oncology, Ankara Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0592-7521
Ihsan GunduzMD. Surgical Gastroenterologist, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tekirdag State Hospital, Tekirdag, Turkey.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7835-7531
Mersin Üniversitesi · TRGülhane Askerî Tıp Akademisi · TRIstanbul Aydın University · TRMinistry of Health · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe results from sphincteroplasty may worsen over time. Reseparation of the rectum and vagina/scrotum in conjunction with sphincteroplasty achieves good results. Improving the surgical effect of sphincteroplasty through perineal body reconstruction is crucial.

objectiveTo evaluate the long-term results from anterior sphincteroplasty and perineal body reconstruction (modified sphincteroplasty) among patients with traumatic sphincter injury. DESIGN AND

settingRetrospective study among patients who underwent modified sphincteroplasty in a university hospital between January 2006 and December 2018. Fifty patients were evaluated in detail.

methodsThe following variables were evaluated: gender, age, additional disease status, time interval between trauma and surgery, surgical technique, duration of hospitalization, follow-up period after surgery, manometric values, electromyography results, magnetic resonance imaging scans, Wexner scores, satisfaction levels with surgery and surgical outcomes.

resultsThe patients' mean age was 44.6 ± 15.1 years. The median follow-up period was 62 months (range, 12-118). The mean Wexner scores preoperatively, postoperatively in first month (M1S) and at the time of this report (AAS) were 15.5 ± 3.2, 1.9 ± 3.15 and 3.9 ± 5.3, respectively. Although improvements in the patients' mean Wexner scores became impaired over time, the postoperative Wexner scores were still significantly better than the preoperative Wexner scores (P = 0.001).

conclusionGood or excellent results were obtained surgically among patients with traumatic sphincter injury. Performing perineal body reconstruction in addition to sphincteroplasty can provide better long-term continence. Surgical outcomes were found to be better, especially among patients younger than 50 years of age and among patients who underwent surgery within the first five years after trauma.

Indexed as

Fecal IncontinenceAdultAnal CanalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeVagina

Identifiers

PMID33656130
PMCPMC9632502
OpenAlexW3119011699

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.