ReviewKorean circulation journal2021
Physiologic Assessment after Coronary Stent Implantation.
Review in Korean circulation journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical and Vessel Characteristics Associated With Hard Outcomes After PCI and Their Combined Prognostic Implications.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Pooled it
- Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve After Coronary Stenting: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.JAMA network open · 2022Pooled it
- Review
- Angiographic Findings and Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Physiology- or Imaging-Guided Strategies for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Practical Application of Coronary Physiologic Assessment: Asia-Pacific Expert Consensus Document: Part 1.JACC. Asia · 2023Review
- Coronary Physiology-Based Approaches for Plaque Vulnerability: Implications for Risk Prediction and Treatment Strategies.Korean circulation journal · 2023Review
- Differential Prognostic Implications of Pre- and Post-Stent Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.Korean circulation journal · 2022Article
- Non-invasive vs. Invasive Functional Tests after Coronary Stent Implantation.Korean circulation journal · 2021Article
- Non-Invasive Physiological Assessment after Coronary Stent Implantation.Korean circulation journal · 2021Article
- Effect of Coronary Disease Characteristics on Prognostic Relevance of Residual Ischemia After Stent Implantation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of myocardial ischemia is a prerequisite for the benefit of coronary revascularization. In the cardiac catheterization laboratory, fractional flow reserve and non-hyperemic pressure ratios are used to define the ischemia-causing coronary stenosis, and several randomized studies showed the benefit of physiology-guided coronary revascularization. However, physiology-guided revascularization does not necessarily guarantee the relief of ischemia. Recent studies reported that residual ischemia might exist in up to 15-20% of cases after angiographically successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, post-PCI physiologic assessment is necessary for judging the appropriateness of PCI, detecting the lesions that may benefit from additional PCI, and risk stratification after PCI. This review will focus on the current evidence for post-PCI physiologic assessment, how to interpret these findings, and the future perspectives of physiologic assessment after PCI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.