Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33655607›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2021

European* clinical practice recommendations on opioids for chronic noncancer pain - Part 1: Role of opioids in the management of chronic noncancer pain.

Winfried Häuser, Bart Morlion, Kevin E Vowles, Kirsty Bannister, Eric Buchser, Roberto Casale, Jean-François Chenot, Gillian Chumbley, Asbjørn Mohr Drewes, Geert Dom and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
19.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 16 institutions in 9 countries.

Winfried HäuserDepartment Internal Medicine 1, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Bart MorlionCenter for Algology & Pain Management, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Kevin E VowlesSchool of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Kirsty BannisterInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
Eric BuchserPain Management and Neuromodulation Centre EHC Hospital, Morges, Switzerland.
Roberto CasaleNeurorehabilitation Unit, Department of Rehabilitation, HABILITA, Bergamo, Italy.
Jean-François ChenotDepartment of General Practice, Institute for Community Medicine, University Medicine Greifswald, Germany.
Gillian ChumbleyImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.
Asbjørn Mohr DrewesMech-Sense, Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Denmark.
Geert DomCollaborative Antwerp Psychiatric Research Institute (CAPRI), Antwerp University, Antwerpen, Belgium.
Liisa JutilaPain Alliance Europe, Finland.
Tony O'BrienCollege of Medicine & Health, University College Cork, Cork, Republic of Ireland.
Esther Pogatzki-ZahnDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Münster UKM, Munster, Germany.
Martin RakusaDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre, Maribor, Slovenia.ORCID 0000-0003-4433-3985
Carmen Suarez-SerranoDepartment of Physiotherapy, University of Sevilla, Sevilla, Spain.
Thomas TölleDepartment of Neurology, Techhnische Universität München, München, Germany.
Nevenka Krčevski ŠkvarčDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Treatment, Faculty of Medicine of University Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia.
Aalborg University Hospital · DKHôpital de Morges · CHImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBKing's College London · GBKlinikum Saarbrücken · DEKU Leuven · BEPain Management Institute · USQueen's University Belfast · GBTechnical University of Munich · DEUniversidad de Sevilla · ESUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity Clinical Centre Maribor · SIUniversity College Cork · IEUniversity Hospital Münster · DEUniversity of Antwerp · BEUniversity of Maribor · SI

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N026969/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOpioid use for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is complex. In the absence of pan-European guidance on this issue, a position paper was commissioned by the European Pain Federation (EFIC).

methodsThe clinical practice recommendations were developed by eight scientific societies and one patient self-help organization under the coordination of EFIC. A systematic literature search in MEDLINE (up until January 2020) was performed. Two categories of guidance are given: Evidence-based recommendations (supported by evidence from systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials or of observational studies) and Good Clinical Practice (GCP) statements (supported either by indirect evidence or by case-series, case-control studies and clinical experience). The GRADE system was applied to move from evidence to recommendations. The recommendations and GCP statements were developed by a multiprofessional task force (including nursing, service users, physicians, physiotherapy and psychology) and formal multistep procedures to reach a set of consensus recommendations. The clinical practice recommendations were reviewed by five external reviewers from North America and Europe and were also posted for public comment.

resultsThe key clinical practice recommendations suggest: (a) first optimizing established non-pharmacological treatments and non-opioid analgesics and (b) considering opioid treatment if established non-pharmacological treatments or non-opioid analgesics are not effective and/or not tolerated and/or contraindicated. Evidence- and clinical consensus-based potential indications and contraindications for opioid treatment are presented. Eighteen GCP recommendations give guidance regarding clinical evaluation, as well as opioid treatment assessment, monitoring, continuation and discontinuation.

conclusionsOpioids remain a treatment option for some selected patients with CNCP under careful surveillance. SIGNIFICANCE: In chronic pain, opioids are neither a universal cure nor a universally dangerous weapon. They should only be used for some selected chronic noncancer pain syndromes if established non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatment options have failed in supervised pain patients as part of a comprehensive, multi-modal, multi-disciplinary approach to treatment. In this context alone, opioid therapy can be a useful tool in achieving and maintaining an optimal level of pain control in some patients.

Indexed as

Chronic PainOpioid-Related DisordersAnalgesics, OpioidEuropeHumansNorth AmericaAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID33655607
PMCPMC8248186
OpenAlexW3133938491

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.