ArticleTropical animal health and production2021
Feed intake, digestibility, and energy contents in growing bull fed pineapple crop waste silage in different planes of nutrition.
Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary inclusion of restaurant food waste effects on nutrient digestibility, milk yield and its composition, blood metabolites of lactating Zaraibi goats, and their offspring performance.Tropical animal health and production · 2022Article
- The effects of fermented pineapple residue on growth performance, meat quality, and rumen microbiota of fattening Simmental bull.Frontiers in microbiology · 2022Article
- Phytosterols and Novel Triterpenes Recovered from Industrial Fermentation Coproducts Exert In Vitro Anti-Inflammatory Activity in Macrophages.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to nutritionally evaluate the use of pineapple crop waste silage in the feeding of growing bull in different planes of nutrition. We used eight non-castrated growing bull housed in individual covered pens, provided with free access to water and individual trough. Two balanced Latin squares conducted simultaneously were used. Treatments consisted of four planes of nutrition (L), formed by multiples of maintenance, i.e., L = ME/Mm; they were ME/Mm, ME/1.5Mm, ME/2Mm, and ME/2.7Mm. The intake of nutrients in diets was determined by the difference between the total mass of food offered and the mass of orts. To determine nutrient digestibility and nitrogen balance, total feces, and urine, collections were performed for seven consecutive days in each animal per period. The increase in planes of nutrition affected (P < 0.05) nutrient intake between L = 1 and L = 1.5. However, there was no effect nutrients intake to 1.5, 2, and 2.7. Nutrient digestibility was affected by the increase in planes of nutrition (P < 0.05), except for dCF (P = 0.0659). Digestible and metabolizable energies were affected (P < 0.05) by the increase in nutritional plans, as well as nitrogen balance. In conclusion, the pineapple crop waste silage presents itself as a good forage alternative for cattle diets, especially during forage shortage periods. Inclusion in the diet at 2.7 × the maintenance level does not compromise growing bull performance. However, the increases in planes of nutrition reduce the digestible energy contents of the diet.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33655391What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.