Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33655377›Full record

ArticleActa neurochirurgica2021

Minimally invasive posterior pedicle screw fixation versus open instrumentation in patients with thoracolumbar spondylodiscitis.

Insa Katrin Janssen, Ann-Kathrin Jörger, Melanie Barz, Chiara Sarkar, Maria Wostrack, Bernhard Meyer

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Acta neurochirurgica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluating a cutting-edge augmented reality-supported navigation system for spinal instrumentation.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Insa Katrin JanssenDepartment of Neurochirurgie, Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland. Insakatrin.janssen@hcuge.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4960-0467
Ann-Kathrin JörgerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Melanie BarzDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Chiara SarkarDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Maria WostrackDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
Bernhard MeyerDepartment of Neurosurgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Ismaninger Straße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
TUM Klinikum · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to the aging society, the incidence of pyogenic spondylodiscitis is still rising. Although surgical treatment for spondylodiscitis in general is increasingly accepted, an optimal surgical strategy for treatment of pyogenic spinal infection has not yet been established. The aim of this study was to investigate the suitability of percutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation for surgical treatment in patients with spondylodiscitis of the thoracolumbar spine.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective review of a consecutive cohort of patients undergoing surgical treatment for spondylodiscitis of the thoracolumbar spine between January 2017 and December 2019. We assessed intraoperative and clinical data, comparing for the classic open and the percutaneous approach. In total, we analyzed 125 cases (39 female, 86 male). The mean age was 69.49 years ± 12.63 years.

resultsForty-seven (37.6%) patients were operated on by a percutaneous approach for pedicle screw fixation, and 78 (62.4%) received open surgery. There was no significant difference in the mean age of patients between both groups (p= 0.57). The time of surgery for percutaneous fixation was statistically significantly shorter (p= 0.03). Furthermore, the estimated intraoperative blood loss was significantly lower in the minimally invasive group (p < 0.001). No significant difference could be observed regarding the recurrence rate of spondylodiscitis and the occurrence of surgical site infections (p= 0.2 and 0.5, respectively).

conclusionPercutaneous posterior pedicle screw fixation appears to be a feasible option for the surgical treatment of a selected patient group with spondylodiscitis of the thoracic and lumbar spine.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBlood Loss, SurgicalDiscitisFemaleHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresPedicle ScrewsPostoperative ComplicationsSpinal FusionThoracic VertebraeMinimally invasive spine surgery (MISS)Open spinal instrumentationPercutaneous pedicle screw fixationPyogenic spinal infectionSpondylodiscitis

Identifiers

PMID33655377
OpenAlexW3135630475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.