Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33655353›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2021

Estimating evapotranspiration by coupling Bayesian model averaging methods with machine learning algorithms.

Yong Yang, Huaiwei Sun, Jie Xue, Yi Liu, Luguang Liu, Dong Yan, Dongwei Gui

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Effects of Human Activities on Evapotranspiration and Its Components in Arid Areas.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  3. Random forest for spatialization of daily evapotranspiration (ETEnvironmental monitoring and assessment · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yong YangSchool of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Huaiwei SunSchool of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China. hsun@hust.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4873-0697
Jie XueState Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, 830011, China.
Yi LiuState Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, 830011, China.
Luguang LiuHubei Water Resources Research Institute, Wuhan, 430072, China.
Dong YanSchool of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430074, China.
Dongwei GuiState Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi, 830011, China.

Funding

Innovative Research Group Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China 52079055National Natural Science Foundation of China 51879110National Natural Science Foundation of China 52011530128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evapotranspiration (ET) is one of the most important components of global hydrologic cycle and has significant impacts on energy exchange and climate change. Numerous models have been developed to estimate ET so far; however, great uncertainties in models still require considerations. The aim of this study is to reduce model errors and uncertainties among multi-models to improve daily ET estimate. The Bayesian model averaging (BMA) method is used to assemble eight ET models to produce ET with Landsat 8 satellite data, including four surface energy balance models (i.e., SEBS, SEBAL, SEBI, and SSEB) and four machine learning algorithms (i.e., polymars, random forest, ridge regression, and support vector machine). Performances of each model and BMA method were validated through in situ measurements of semi-arid region. Results indicated that the BMA method outperformed all eight single models. The four most important models obtained by the BMA method were ranked by random forest, SVM, SEBS, and SEBAL. The BMA method coupled with machine learning can significantly improve the accuracy of daily ET estimate, reducing uncertainties among models, and taking different intrinsic benefits of empirically and physically based models to obtain a more reliable ET estimate.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringMachine LearningAlgorithmsBayes TheoremSupport Vector MachineBayesian model averaging (BMA)EvapotranspirationLandsatMachine learningSurface energy balance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.