Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33655214›Full record

ArticleCritical care explorations2021

The Presentation, Pace, and Profile of Infection and Sepsis Patients Hospitalized Through the Emergency Department: An Exploratory Analysis.

Vincent X Liu, Meghana Bhimarao, John D Greene, Raj N Manickam, Adriana Martinez, Alejandro Schuler, Fernando Barreda, Gabriel J Escobar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care explorations, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Diagnostic accuracy of SeptiCyte® RAPID to discriminate sepsis from non-infectious critical illness in patients meeting sepsis criteria according to sepsis-3 definition at ICU admission.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Vincent X LiuDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA.
Meghana BhimaraoDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA.
John D GreeneDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA.
Raj N ManickamDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA.
Adriana MartinezUniversity of California Davis School of Medicine, Davis, CA.
Alejandro SchulerUnlearn.Ai, San Francisco, CA.
Fernando BarredaDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA.
Gabriel J EscobarDivision of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA.
Kaiser Permanente · USColorado Permanente Medical Group · USUniversity of California, Davis · US

Funding

Identifying pre-sepsis opportunities for early, targeted intervention - Equipment SupplementR35GM128672 · NIGMS · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Vincent Liu · 2018 to 2026
$4.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To characterize the signs and symptoms of sepsis, compare them with those from simple infection and other emergent conditions and evaluate their association with hospital outcomes. DESIGN SETTING PARTICIPANTS AND

interventionA multicenter, retrospective cohort study of 408,377 patients hospitalized through the emergency department from 2012 to 2017 with sepsis, suspected infection, heart failure, or stroke. Infected patients were identified based on Sepsis-3 criteria, whereas noninfected patients were identified through diagnosis codes. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

resultsSigns and symptoms were identified within physician clinical documentation in the first 24 hours of hospitalization using natural language processing. The time of sign and symptom onset prior to presentation was quantified, and sign and symptom prevalence was assessed. Using multivariable logistic regression, the association of each sign and symptom with four outcomes was evaluated: sepsis versus suspected infection diagnosis, hospital mortality, ICU admission, and time of first antibiotics (> 3 vs ≤ 3 hr from presentation). A total of 10,825 signs and symptoms were identified in 6,148,348 clinical documentation fragments. The most common symptoms overall were as follows: dyspnea (35.2%), weakness (27.2%), altered mental status (24.3%), pain (23.9%), cough (19.7%), edema (17.8%), nausea (16.9%), hypertension (15.6%), fever (13.9%), and chest pain (12.1%). Compared with predominant signs and symptoms in heart failure and stroke, those present in infection were heterogeneous. Signs and symptoms indicative of neurologic dysfunction, significant respiratory conditions, and hypotension were strongly associated with sepsis diagnosis, hospital mortality, and intensive care. Fever, present in only a minority of patients, was associated with improved mortality (odds ratio, 0.67, 95% CI, 0.64-0.70;

conclusionsThe clinical presentation of sepsis was heterogeneous and occurred with rapid onset prior to hospital presentation. These findings have important implications for improving public education, clinical treatment, and quality measures of sepsis care.

Indexed as

electronic health recordinfectionmortalityoutcomessepsis

Identifiers

PMID33655214
PMCPMC7909460
OpenAlexW3135730434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.