Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33655201›Full record

ArticleConservation science and practice2021

The role of risk perception and affect in predicting support for conservation policy under rapid ecosystem change.

Freya A V St John, Tom H E Mason, Nils Bunnefeld

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Conservation science and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cub Survival in a Wild Leopard (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Freya A V St JohnSchool of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5707-310X
Tom H E MasonConservation Ecology Group, Department of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0834-0571
Nils BunnefeldBiological and Environmental Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1349-4463

Funding

European Research Council 679651European Research Council 755965
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conservation conflicts are damaging for humans and wildlife, with differences in people's objectives fuelling challenges of managing complex, dynamic systems. We investigate the relative importance of economic, psychological (affect, trust and risk perception) and ecological factors in determining farmers' management preferences, using Greenland barnacle geese (

Indexed as

affectarousalbarnacle geeseconflictcullingdecision-makingemotionhazard acceptancepsychologyriskvalence

Identifiers

PMID33655201
PMCPMC7116843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.