Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33655172›Full record

ArticleSpartan medical research journal2020

Provider Driven Follow-Up in a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol: Round Two of the PDSA Cycle in a Multidisciplinary Quality Improvement Patient Safety Project.

Isaac Troiano, Mary Mitchell, Mark Schury, Nikolai Butki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Spartan medical research journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Isaac TroianoMcLaren Oakland.
Mary MitchellMcLaren Oakland.
Mark SchuryMcLaren Oakland.
Nikolai ButkiMcLaren Oakland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextIn 2016, the McLaren Oakland Department of Emergency Medicine developed and implemented a Chest Pain Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol (CP-ADP) to identify patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain who were at low risk for acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and appropriate for outpatient follow-up. The evaluation of the QI/PS project demonstrated that only 47% of the patients discharged from the ED under the CP-ADP received outpatient follow-up. In response, a second round of the PDSA cycle modified the CP-ADP to add a multidisciplinary provider driven follow-up.

methodsAfter ED discharge, patients in the CP-ADP with provider driven follow-up were contacted by a primary care physician to schedule a follow-up appointment. The premise was that this provider driven follow-up would alleviate navigation of the health care system as a barrier to follow-up.

resultsThe evaluation of the modified CP-ADP with provider driven follow-up demonstrated that 9 of the 30 patients discharged from the ED were able to be contacted. 21 of the patients were unable to be reached by the phone number they provided. Only 3 patients discharged with provider driven follow-up showed up to follow up appointments.

conclusionsThere were some internal process failures identified that contributed to the low numbers of patients that were successfully contacted. External factors such as patient access to phones and means of communication were also discussed as factors that were originally not considered.

Indexed as

adpchest painmultidisciplinaryqips

Identifiers

PMID33655172
PMCPMC7746070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.