ArticleSpartan medical research journal2018
Improving Pneumococcal Vaccination Rates in a Community-Based Internal Medicine Resident Clinic.
Article in Spartan medical research journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
contextDespite proven benefits of vaccination such as reduced morbidity and mortality, many patients remain out of date on their recommended vaccines. The goal of this pilot project was to develop and test a systematic vaccination review and ordering protocol aimed to increase the percentage of patients who were assessed under current pneumococcal vaccine recommendations by 5%.
methodsThe study location was set in a community-based internal medicine resident clinic in Muskegon, Michigan, with the patient population coming from the same setting. Data from 50 patients who had completed office visit appointments at a resident clinic from January 2016 through April 7th, 2017 were randomly extracted before implementation of the protocol. Two months post-implementation, the authors obtained office visit data from another randomly selected 50 clinic patients for comparison. The nurses and medical assistants in the office had been educated on the pneumonia vaccine protocol based on CDC (United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) vaccination guidelines and state registry records. They were also provided copies of the seven-step vaccine assessment and ordering protocol that included obtaining MCIR (Michigan Care Improvement Registry) data to update the patient's chart for a possible provider order set. Clinic residents were also educated on CDC pneumonia vaccine guidelines, and the authors posted several guideline related posters on clinic walls.
resultsThe authors initially compared the percentage of patients who providers had assessed regarding their vaccination status before protocol implementation to the percentage of patients after protocol implementation. There was a 10% post-implementation increase in pneumonia vaccination assessment.
conclusionsAlthough the results of this pilot project are obviously limited by methodological and sample size characteristics, the initially measured improvements in vaccination status suggests that this type of systematic protocol approach may warrant further testing in similar settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33655129PMC7746109What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.