ArticleHeliyon2021
How regime type and governance quality affect policy responses to COVID-19: A preliminary analysis.
Article in Heliyon, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The COVID-19 pandemic and economic recovery: The mediating role of governance, a global perspective.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Singapore's COVID-19 crisis decision-making through centralization, legitimacy, and agility: an empirical analysis.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2024Article
- Culture and political regimes: How have they influenced the effectiveness of COVID-19 response policy?Heliyon · 2024Article
- Democratic quality and excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Governance and Public Health Decision-Making During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review.Public health reviews · 2024Article
- Pakistan's national COVID-19 response: lessons from an emergent response to the pandemic.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- The effect of adaptive capacity on resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-country analysis.Jamba (Potchefstroom, South Africa) · 2024Article
- National and subnational governance and decision-making processes during the COVID-19 pandemic in Nigeria: an empirical analysis.BMJ global health · 2023Article
- Socio-cultural Correlates of the COVID-19 Outcomes.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2022Article
- Attributes of national governance for an effective response to public health emergencies: Lessons from the response to the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of global health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has slowed down economies, upended societies, and tremendously affected the daily lives of ordinary people throughout the world. In the international context, various government responses have thus given rise to many political debates and discussions centered around the handling of these impacts and the novel coronavirus itself. Here, emphasis is often placed on how regime type (i.e., democratic or non-democratic) and governance quality influence policies aimed at responding to the ongoing crisis. By examining relevant scientific resources, including the COVID-19 Global Response Index (developed by FP Analytics), Worldwide Governance Indicators (WGI), and Bjørnskov-Rode regime data, this study found that regime type was indeed related to governmental policy responses to COVID-19. Results specifically showed that governance quality (especially effectiveness) had moderate impacts on how well these policies were implemented. Due to several limitations, however, these findings should be regarded as preliminary evidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.