Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33654896›Full record

ArticleBio-protocol2019

Phospho-protein Analysis in Adherent Cells Using Flow Cytometry.

Renu Sharma, Amit Sharma, Atul Kumar, Bithiah Grace Jaganathan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bio-protocol, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Renu SharmaStem Cells and Cancer Biology Group, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Guwahati, India.
Amit SharmaStem Cells and Cancer Biology Group, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Guwahati, India.
Atul KumarStem Cells and Cancer Biology Group, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Guwahati, India.
Bithiah Grace JaganathanStem Cells and Cancer Biology Group, Department of Biosciences and Bioengineering, Guwahati, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein phosphorylation is one of the most important post-translational modifications, which acts as a reversible on or off switch for the activity of a large number of proteins. Analyzing the phosphorylation status of different proteins can reveal the alterations in the state of the cells in response to cellular damage, cancer and pharmaceutical drugs. Techniques such as mass spectrometry, radiolabeling, 2D-gel electrophoresis and western blotting are used to quantify protein phosphorylation. These assays can quantify phosphorylation in the bulk population of cells, however, flow cytometry can couple cell surface marker expression data with phosphorylation data to understand differential signaling in a sub-population within a heterogeneous population of cells. Our protocol describes the use of flow-cytometry for rapid and single cell-based quantification of intracellular phospho-protein with the help of anti-phospho protein specific antibody.

Indexed as

Intracellular stainingPhospho-proteinProtein phosphorylationSignaling pathwaysSingle cell analysis

Identifiers

PMID33654896
PMCPMC7853998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.