ArticleBio-protocol2019
Identification of Heteroreceptors Complexes and Signal Transduction Events Using Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET).
Article in Bio-protocol, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- 5HT1AR-FGFR1 Heteroreceptor Complexes Differently Modulate GIRK Currents in the Dorsal Hippocampus and the Dorsal Raphe Serotonin Nucleus of Control Rats and of a Genetic Rat Model of Depression.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Detecting protein-protein interactions by co-immunoprecipitation provided a major advancement in the immunology research field. In the G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) research field, colocalization and co-immunoprecipitation were used to detect interactions, but doubts arose due to specificity of the antibodies (monoclonal in the case of receptors related to immunology and polyclonal in the case of GPCRs) and due to the possibility of false positive due to the potential occurrence of bridging proteins. Accordingly, new methodological approaches were needed, and energy transfer techniques have been instrumental to detect direct protein-protein, protein-receptor or receptor-receptor interactions. Of the two most relevant methods (Förster, or fluorescence resonance energy transfer: FRET and Bioluminescence energy transfer: BRET), the protocol for BRET is here presented. BRET has been instrumental to detect direct interactions between GPCRs and has contributed to demonstrate that GPCR dimers/oligomer functionality is different from that exerted by individual receptors. Advantages outweigh those of FRET as no fluorescence source is needed. Interestingly, BRET is not only useful to validate interactions detected by other means or hypothesized in the basis of indirect evidence, but to measure signal transduction events. In fact, BRET may, for instance, be used to assess β-arrestin recruitment to activated GPCRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.