Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33654653›Full record

ReviewNanotheranostics2021

Radiolabelling of Extracellular Vesicles for PET and SPECT imaging.

Azalea A Khan, Rafael T M de Rosales

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanotheranostics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. PET Imaging of Small Extracellular VesiclesBioconjugate chemistry · 2022
    Article
  19. Nanomaterial Probes for Nuclear Imaging.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Azalea A KhanDept. of Imaging Chemistry and Biology, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Rafael T M de RosalesDept. of Imaging Chemistry and Biology, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UKDepartment of Health IS-BRC-1215-20006Medical Research Council MR/N013700/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT/203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) such as exosomes and microvesicles have gained recent attention as potential biomarkers of disease as well as nanomedicinal tools, but their behaviour

Indexed as

AnimalsExtracellular VesiclesHumansPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonRadiopharmaceuticalsEVsExosomesImagingNanomedicinePETRadiolabellingSPECT.

Identifiers

PMID33654653
PMCPMC7914338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.