Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33654390›Full record

ArticleClinical interventions in aging2021

Timed Up and Go: Reference Values for Community-Dwelling Older Adults with and without Arthritis and Non-Communicable Diseases: The Tromsø Study.

Odd-Einar Svinøy, Gunvor Hilde, Astrid Bergland, Bjørn Heine Strand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical interventions in aging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Physical performance and sarcopenia assessment in patients with a recent fracture visiting the Fracture Liaison Service.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2024
    Article
  15. Physical performance tests and in-hospital outcomes in elective open chest heart surgery.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2023
    Article
  16. Improving Physical Functioning for People on Long-Term Dialysis: What Does the Evidence Show?Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2023
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Odd-Einar SvinøyFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0206-1283
Gunvor HildeFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-9931-8080
Astrid BerglandFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Physiotherapy, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4349-8200
Bjørn Heine StrandDepartment of Chronic Diseases and Ageing, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-4385-8886

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe Timed Up and Go (TUG) test is used to assess a person's mobility and balance. We aimed to provide updated reference values for TUG performance for the community-dwelling older population according to age and sex, and according to the presence of arthritis and non-communicable diseases (NCDs). PARTICIPANTS AND

methodsCross-sectional data from the seventh wave (2015-2016) of the population-based Norwegian Tromsø Study counting 5400 community-dwelling people (53% women), aged 60-84 years were used. Reference values were presented as percentiles and means for men and women by age at five-year intervals.

resultsMedian TUG score was stable during age 60-65 years, and after age 65 years median TUG score increased significantly with age (increase by 0.14 sec per 1 year higher age in both men and women, p<0.001). At the youngest ages (<65 years), in both men and women, there were no differences in TUG performance for those with NCD or arthritis compared to those without these diseases. After age 65 however, those without these diseases performed significantly better (p<0.05) in both men and women.

conclusionThe present study provided percentile reference values for TUG performance in community-dwelling older adults in Norway by age and sex, and in subgroups of those having arthritis and NCDs. TUG scores increased with age, and performance was significantly poorer among participants with arthritis or NCDs after age 65 years. The findings may guide clinical interventions for individuals with mobility and balance disabilities.

Indexed as

ArthritisPhysical Functional PerformancePostural BalanceAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGeriatric AssessmentHumansIndependent LivingMaleNoncommunicable DiseasesNorwayReference Valuesarthritisgeriatric assessmentnon-communicable diseasesphysical functionreference valuesTimed Up and Go

Identifiers

PMID33654390
PMCPMC7914052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.