Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33654316›Full record

Trial reportEye (London, England)2022

Efficacy and tolerability of polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine 0.6% treatment in adenoviral keratoconjunctivitis: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

Gabriella Ricciardelli, Giuseppe Giannaccare, Antonio Di Zazzo, Marco Coassin, Vincenzo Scorcia, Mario R Romano, Davide Allegrini, Michela Cennamo, Marco Antonini, Federico Bernabei and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Eye (London, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Povidone Iodine 0.66% to FightCase reports in ophthalmology
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Gabriella RicciardelliDepartment of Ophthalmology, Humanitas Gavazzeni e Castelli, Via Mazzini, Bergamo, Italy. gabriella.ricciardelli01@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2741-6247
Giuseppe GiannaccareDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2617-0289
Antonio Di ZazzoOphthalmology Complex Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5264-5973
Marco CoassinOphthalmology Complex Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Vincenzo ScorciaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6826-7957
Mario R RomanoDepartment of Ophthalmology, Humanitas Gavazzeni e Castelli, Via Mazzini, Bergamo, Italy.
Davide AllegriniDepartment of Ophthalmology, Humanitas Gavazzeni e Castelli, Via Mazzini, Bergamo, Italy.
Michela CennamoEye Clinic, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Marco AntoniniOphthalmology Complex Unit, Campus Bio-Medico University Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Federico BernabeiOphthalmology Unit, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0494-6293
Alberto MorelliEye Clinic, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Rita MencucciEye Clinic, Department of Neurosciences, Psychology, Pharmacology and Child Health, University of Florence, Largo Brambilla 3, 50134, Florence, Italy.
Università Campus Bio-Medico · ITUniversity of Florence · ITHumanitas Gavazzeni · ITMagna Graecia University · ITHumanitas University · ITIRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo analyze the effect of the employment of polyvinylpyrrolidone-iodine (PVP-I) 0.6% eye drop on the clinical course of patients affected by Adenoviral Keratoconjunctivitis (AKC).

methodsConsecutive patients with clinical signs of AKC and positive results of AdenoPlus test were enrolled from four Italian Centres. Patients were randomized to receive: PVP-I 0.6% eye drops four times/daily for 20 days (Group A) or hyaluronate-based tear substitutes four times/daily for 20 days (Group B). Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), optical coherence tomography (OCT) Optovue iVue pachymetry map; corneal haze; conjunctival injection and chemosis; subepithelial corneal infiltrates (SEIs); corneal and conjunctival staining and corneal densitometry were recorded at diagnosis and at every follow-up visit. The primary outcome was the resolution time of AKC.

resultsOverall, 59 AKC patients (34 for Group A and 25 for Group B) completed the study. Patients of Group A showed a significantly shorter resolution time and lower incidence of SEIs compared to patients of Group B. In particular, SEIs were present at the last visit in 3/34 (8.82%) patients of the Group A vs 11/25 (44%) of the Group B (p = 0.005). Patients of Group A showed a significantly lower incidence of corneal haze compared to patients of Group B (0/34 vs 3/25; p = 0.038). No side effects were reported for both groups.

conclusionsAlthough further clinical evaluations are needed, according to our data the use of PVP-I 0.6% eye drop in the setting of AKC reduces the risk of SEIs as well as the resolution time of the disease.

Indexed as

IodineKeratoconjunctivitisHumansOphthalmic SolutionsPovidonePovidone-IodineProspective StudiesIodineOphthalmic SolutionsPovidonePovidone-Iodine

Identifiers

PMID33654316
PMCPMC8727611
OpenAlexW3135867797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.