Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33654264›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2021

Regulation of mating genes during arbuscular mycorrhizal isolate co-existence-where is the evidence?

Mathu Malar C, Christophe Roux, Nicolas Corradi

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mathu Malar CDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Christophe RouxLaboratoire de Recherche en Sciences Végétales, Université de Toulouse, UPS, CNRS 24 Chemin de Borde Rouge-Auzeville, Castanet-Tolosan, France.
Nicolas CorradiDepartment of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada. ncorradi@uottawa.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7932-7932

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A recent study published by Mateus et al. [1] claimed that 18 "mating-related" genes are differentially expressed in the model arbuscular mycorrhizal fungus (AMF) Rhizophagus irregularis when genetically distinct fungal strains co-colonize a host plant. To clarify the level of evidence for this interesting conclusion, we first aimed to validate the functional annotation of these 18 R. irregularis genes using orthology predictions. These analyses revealed that, although sequence relationship exists, only 2 of the claimed 18 R. irregularis mating genes are potential orthologues to validated fungal mating genes. We also investigated the RNA-seq data from Mateus et al. [1] using classical RNA-seq methods and statistics. This analysis found that the over-expression during strain co-existence was not significant at the typical cut-off of the R. irregularis strains DAOM197198 and B1 in plants. Overall, we do not find convincing evidence that the genes involved have functions in mating, or that they are reproducibly up or down regulated during co-existence in plants.

Indexed as

GlomeromycotaMycorrhizaeFungiGenes, FungalSymbiosis

Identifiers

PMID33654264
PMCPMC8319156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.