ArticleJournal of human hypertension2021
Different impact factors for accurate oscillometric blood pressure measurement between sinus rhythm and atrial fibrillation.
Article in Journal of human hypertension, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood pressure in atrial fibrillation and in sinus rhythm during ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: data from the TEMPLAR project.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024Article
- Accuracy of oscillometric-based blood pressure monitoring devices: impact of pulse volume, arrhythmia, and respiratory artifact.Journal of human hypertension · 2024Article
- Assessment of aortic stiffness during atrial fibrillation: solutions and considerations.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate whether the impact factor on the accuracy of oscillometric blood pressure (BP) is different between the patients with atrial affiliation (AF) and sinus rhythm (SR). This study included 124 AF patients and 98 SR patients who underwent coronary arteriography. Upper arm oscillometric and intro-aortic BP were simultaneously measured three times, and the averages were recorded as final values, respectively. The difference between oscillometric and intro-aortic BP was recorded as delta BP. For reducing the influence of baseline BP on delta BP, a percentage difference (PD-BP) was calculated with the formula: PD-BP = delta BP/intro-aortic BP × 100%. The oscillometric SBP and DBP levels slightly underestimated intro-aortic BP (by 2.2/1.6 mmHg) in the SR group, but significantly underestimated (by 5.8/4.8 mmHg) in the AF group. Age was negatively correlated with delta SBP and positively with delta DBP in SR patients, but not correlated in AF patients. Otherwise, ventricular rate (VR) was negatively correlated with delta SBP or delta DBP in AF, which indicated that the accuracy of oscillometric BP declined as the VR increased. With intro-aortic BP as reference, the accuracy of oscillometric BP in AF patients is lower than SR patients. Meanwhile, age may impact the oscillometric BP accuracy in SR patients, but VR may impact that in AF patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.