ReviewJournal of human hypertension2021
Certain beta blockers (e.g., bisoprolol) may be reevaluated in hypertension guidelines for patients with left ventricular hypertrophy to diminish the ventricular arrhythmic risk.
Review in Journal of human hypertension, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hypertensive Heart Disease: Mechanisms, Diagnosis and Treatment.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Review
- A Need for Improvement in the Definition of Resistant Arterial Hypertension.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Review
- Role of Trientine in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Review of Mechanistic Aspects.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Left Ventricular Hypertrophy: Etiology-Based Therapeutic Options.Cardiology and therapy · 2022Review
- A Discrepancy: Calcium Channel Blockers Are Effective for the Treatment of Hypertensive Left Ventricular Hypertrophy but Not as Effective for Prevention of Heart Failure.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hypertensive left ventricular hypertrophy (HTN LVH) is associated with almost threefold increased risk of ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF). Furthermore, HTN LVH increases the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). The reverse LV remodeling due to efficient antihypertensive therapy lowers the incidence rates of cardiovascular events and SCD and the vast majority of available arterial hypertension (HTN) guidelines recommend renin angiotensin system (RAS) blockers and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) for HTN LVH aiming for LVH regression. On the other hand, beta blockers (BBs) as a class are not recommended in HTN LVH due to their insufficient capacity to reverse LVH remodeling even though they are recommended as the first-line drugs for prevention/treatment of VT/VF (in general, unrelated to HTN LVH). Moreover, BBs are the best antiarrhythmic (against VT/VF) among antihypertensive drugs. Despite that, BBs are currently not recommended for LVH treatment in HTN Guidelines. It is important to prevent VT/VF in patients at high risk, such as those with HTN LVH. Therefore, certain BBs (such as Bisoprolol) may be reevaluated in guidelines for HTN (in the section of HTN LVH).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.