Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33654013›Full record

ReviewCancer nursing

A Concept Analysis of Oral Anticancer Agent Self-management.

Madilyn Mason, Marcelline R Harris, Joseph A Greer, Yun Jiang

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Factors associated with medication adherence trajectory among patients treated with oral anticancer drugs: a multicentre cohort study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Observational
  4. Building Patient-Facing Technology: A REDCap-Based Approach.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2025
    Article
  5. The relationship between medication beliefs, patient activation, and self-rated health in patients taking oral anticancer agents.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Enhancing Safety via Medication Self-Management and Timely Reporting.Studies in health technology and informatics · 2021
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Madilyn MasonAuthor Affiliations: Department of Systems, Populations, and Leadership, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor (Ms Mason and Drs Harris and Jiang); Center for Psychiatric Oncology & Behavioral Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston (Dr Greer).
Marcelline R Harris
Joseph A Greer
Yun Jiang
Jianghan University · CNGreo · CA

Funding

Pilot Projects CoreP20NR015331 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LARSON, JANET L. · 2014 to 2018
$1.3M
NINR NIH HHS P20 NR015331
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rapid development and adoption of oral anticancer agents (OAAs) for cancer management have shifted patients' roles from recipient to owner of their care delivery, assuming their responsibilities for self-managing their OAA treatments at home, while the concept of oral anticancer agent self-management (OAA-SM) has not been well clarified and defined.

objectiveThis study was to clarify the concept of OAA-SM and identify major components, influential factors, and consequences of OAA-SM, as well as propose a representative conceptual model of OAA-SM.

methodsA literature review was conducted concerning the concept and application of OAA-SM. The Walker and Avant method for concept analysis was utilized to guide the examination of OAA-SM.

resultsOAA-SM is a multifaceted and dynamic process that requires continuous adaptation by patients as multiple self-management challenges can emerge throughout OAA treatments. The defining attributes of OAA-SM include OAA adherence, adverse-effect self-management, patient-provider communication, and OAA safe storage, handling, and administration practices. Oral anticancer agent-SM is potentially influenced by a variety of patient-related, OAA-related, and healthcare system factors. Effective OAA-SM is associated with better patient and healthcare outcomes.

conclusionsThe clarification of the concept of OAA-SM and the identification of attributes of OAA-SM and their interrelationships contribute to the body of knowledge in OAA-SM. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This concept analysis provides the foundation to increase healthcare providers' understanding of patients' needs for OAA-SM support and guides the development of patient-centered interventions to empower and engage patients and their families in effective OAA-SM, and improve patients' quality of life and care.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsNeoplasmsSelf-ManagementAdministration, OralHumansQuality of LifeAntineoplastic Agents

Identifiers

PMID33654013
PMCPMC8390565
OpenAlexW3134874601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.