Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33653941›Full record

ArticlemSystems2021

Air versus Water Chilling of Chicken: a Pilot Study of Quality, Shelf-Life, Microbial Ecology, and Economics.

Aeriel D Belk, Toni Duarte, Casey Quinn, David A Coil, Keith E Belk, Jonathan A Eisen, Jason C Quinn, Jennifer N Martin, Xiang Yang, Jessica L Metcalf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in mSystems, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Aeriel D Belk *Department of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9925-6986
Toni Duarte *Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Casey QuinnDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
David A CoilGenome Center, University of California, Davis, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6049-8240
Keith E BelkDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Jonathan A EisenGenome Center, University of California, Davis, California, USA.
Jason C QuinnDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Jennifer N MartinDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA jennifer.martin@colostate.edu xcryang@ucdavis.edu jessicalmetcalf@gmail.com.
Xiang YangDepartment of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, California, USA jennifer.martin@colostate.edu xcryang@ucdavis.edu jessicalmetcalf@gmail.com.
Jessica L MetcalfDepartment of Animal Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA jennifer.martin@colostate.edu xcryang@ucdavis.edu jessicalmetcalf@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8374-8046

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The United States' large-scale poultry meat industry is energy and water intensive, and opportunities may exist to improve sustainability during the broiler chilling process. By USDA regulation, after harvest the internal temperature of the chicken must be reduced to 40°F or less within 16 h to inhibit bacterial growth that would otherwise compromise the safety of the product. This step is accomplished most commonly by water immersion chilling in the United States, while air chilling methods dominate other global markets. A comprehensive understanding of the differences between these chilling methods is lacking. Therefore, we assessed the meat quality, shelf-life, microbial ecology, and techno-economic impacts of chilling methods on chicken broilers in a university meat laboratory setting. We discovered that air chilling methods resulted in superior chicken odor and shelf-life, especially prior to 14 days of dark storage. Moreover, we demonstrated that air chilling resulted in a more diverse microbiome that we hypothesize may delay the dominance of the spoilage organism

Indexed as

16S rRNA16S rRNA genechickenchilling methodsenergymeatmicrobiomepseudomonasshelf lifespoilagetechno-economicstechnoeconomics

Identifiers

PMID33653941
PMCPMC8546986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.