Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33653750›Full record

Observational studyBMJ open2021

How many medications do doctors in primary care use? An observational study of the DU90% indicator in primary care in England.

Chiamaka Chiedozie, Mark E Murphy, Tom Fahey, Frank Moriarty

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Chiamaka ChiedozieHRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.
Mark E MurphyHRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4240-5327
Tom FaheyHRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5896-5783
Frank MoriartyHRB Centre for Primary Care Research, Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland frankmoriarty@rcsi.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9838-3625

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo apply the drug utilisation 90% (DU90%) indicator (the number of unique drugs which makes up 90% of a doctor's prescribing) to general practitioner (GP) practices prescribing in England to examine time trends, practice-level variation, and relationships with practice characteristics, prescribing costs and low-value prescribing. STUDY

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingPrimary care in England, using publicly available prescribing data available from the National Health Service (NHS) digital platform for 2013-2017.

participantsAll general practices in England (n=7620). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The DU90% was calculated on an annual basis for each practice based on medication British National Formulary codes. Low-value prescribing was defined using NHS 2017 guidance (including lidocaine plasters, liothyronine, omega-3 supplements). Descriptive statistics were generated per year on time trends and practice-level variation in the DU90%. Multilevel linear regression was used to examine the practice characteristics (relating to staff, patients and deprivation of the practice area).

resultsAmong 7620 practices, mean DU90% ranged from 130.0 to 131.0 across study years, and regarding variation between practices, there was a 1.4-fold difference between the lowest and highest 5% of practices. A range of medications were included in the DU90% of virtually all practices, including atorvastatin, levothyroxine, omeprazole, ramipril, amlodipine, simvastatin and aspirin. A higher volume of prescribing was associated with a lower DU90%, while having more patients, higher proportions of patients who are women or aged ≥45 years, higher number of GPs working in the practice and being in a more deprived area were associated with a higher DU90%. Practices in higher quintiles of DU90% had higher levels of low-priority prescribing and prescribing costs.

conclusionGP practices typically use 130 different medications in the bulk of their prescribing. Higher DU90% was associated with higher levels of low-priority prescribing and prescribing costs. Increasing use of personal formularies may enhance prescribing quality and reduce costs.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareState MedicineDrug UtilizationEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPractice Patterns, Physicians'Retrospective Studiesclinical pharmacologyepidemiologyprimary carequality in healthcare

Identifiers

PMID33653750
PMCPMC7929869
OpenAlexW3133532775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.