Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33653626›Full record

ReviewUltrasound in medicine & biology2021

Emerging Applications of Ultrasound-Contrast Agents in Radiation Therapy.

Quezia Lacerda, Mohamed Tantawi, Dennis B Leeper, Margaret A Wheatley, John R Eisenbrey

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Application of Ultrasound Combined with Microbubbles for Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Quezia LacerdaSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA; Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Mohamed TantawiDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Dennis B LeeperDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Margaret A WheatleySchool of Biomedical Engineering and Health Sciences, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
John R EisenbreyDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: John.Eisenbrey@jefferson.edu.
Thomas Jefferson University · USDrexel University · US

Funding

Clinically Translatable Ultrasound-Sensitive Microbubble Approaches for Overcoming Tumor HypoxiaR01EB026881 · NIBIB · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI EISENBREY, JOHN, WHEATLEY, MARGARET A. · 2018 to 2021
$2.5M
Microbubble Cavitation for Improving Hepatocellular Carcinoma RadioembolizationR01CA238241 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI ANTON, KEVIN, EISENBREY, JOHN · 2020 to 2024
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA238241NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Radiation therapy (RT) causes DNA damage through ionization, leading to double-strand breaks. In addition, it generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), which are toxic to tumor cells and the vasculature. However, hypoxic regions in the tumor have been shown to not only decrease treatment response but also increase the likelihood of recurrence and metastasis. Ultrasound-sensitive micro-bubbles are emerging as a useful diagnostic and therapeutic tool within RT. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) has shown great promise in early prediction of tumor response to RT. Ultrasound-triggered micro-bubble cavitation has also been shown to induce bio-effects that can sensitize angiogenic tumor vessels to RT. Additionally, ultrasound can trigger the release of drugs from micro-bubble carriers via localized micro-bubble destruction. This approach has numerous applications in RT, including targeted oxygen delivery before radiotherapy. Furthermore, micro-bubbles can be used to locally create ROS without radiation. Sonodynamic therapy uses focused ultrasound and a sonosensitizer to selectively produce ROS in the tumor region and has been explored as a treatment option for cancer. This review summarizes emerging applications of ultrasound contrast agents in RT and ROS augmentation.

Indexed as

Contrast MediaMicrobubblesDrug Delivery SystemsHumansNeoplasmsRadiotherapyUltrasonographyContrast MediaContrast-enhanced ultrasoundMicro-bubblesRadiotherapyTumor hypoxiaUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID33653626
PMCPMC8044052
OpenAlexW3134421739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.