Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33653393›Full record

ArticleParasites & vectors2021

Monitoring migrant groups as a post-validation surveillance approach to contain the potential reemergence of lymphatic filariasis in Togo.

Monique Ameyo Dorkenoo, Martin Kouame Tchankoni, Degninou Yehadji, Kossi Yakpa, Mawèké Tchalim, Efoe Sossou, Rachel Bronzan, Didier Koumavi Ekouevi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Parasites & vectors, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Monique Ameyo DorkenooUniversité de Lomé, Faculté des Sciences de la Santé, BP 1515, Lomé, Togo. monicadork@yahoo.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1030-7757
Martin Kouame TchankoniCentre Africain de Recherche en Epidémiologie et en Santé Publique (CARESP), Lomé, Togo.
Degninou YehadjiDivision des Laboratoires, Ministère de la Santé et de l'Hygiène Publique, 374 avenue Georges Pompidou, BP 1161, Lomé, Togo.
Kossi YakpaLaboratoire de Parasitologie, Programme National de Lutte contre le Paludisme, Ministère de la Santé et de l'Hygiène Publique, Rue Adamé, Quartier administratif BP 518, Lomé, Togo.
Mawèké TchalimProgramme National d'Elimination de la Filariose Lymphatique, Ministère de la Santé et de l'Hygiène Publique, BP 336, Lomé, Togo.
Efoe SossouDivision des Laboratoires, Ministère de la Santé et de l'Hygiène Publique, 374 avenue Georges Pompidou, BP 1161, Lomé, Togo.
Rachel BronzanHealth and Development International (HDI), Newburyport, MA, USA.
Didier Koumavi EkoueviUniversité de Lomé, Faculté des Sciences de la Santé, BP 1515, Lomé, Togo.

Funding

African Reasearch Network for NTD SEC/0417/SGP_015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn March 2017, Togo was declared the first country in sub-Saharan Africa to eliminate lymphatic filariasis as a public health problem, but post-validation surveillance has been lacking. In some areas of the country, migrant groups from neighboring countries that are still endemic for LF pose a risk of reintroduction of LF to Togo. The objective of this study was to identify the risk posed by migrant groups by measuring their prevalence of LF infection and investigating any positive case using Togo's case investigation algorithm to prevent resurgence of LF and sustain Togo's elimination success.

methodA cross-sectional study was conducted in 2018 in the northernmost region of the country. Three migrant populations were identified: (i) nomadic Peuhls, (ii) Togolese members of local communities who migrate annually to neighboring countries for seasonal labor, and (iii) refugees from Ghana who came to Togo because of a communal conflict in Ghana. A questionnaire was designed to collect data on demographics and history of LF and MDA; all participants were tested for circulating filariasis antigen (CFA) using the filariasis test strip (FTS). Any CFA-positive case was confirmed with nocturnal microfilaremia.

resultsRefugees, seasonal economic migrants and nomadic Peuhls represented 42.1%, 31.4% and 26.5% of the study participants, respectively. The overall prevalence of CFA was 4.2% (58/1391) with the highest prevalence in the nomadic Peuhl group (11.9%), but only one of them (0.07%) was confirmed positive with nocturnal microfilaremia. Using the case investigation algorithm, no other positive case was identified in the positive case's surroundings.

conclusionThis study demonstrates that nomadic Peuhls, with a CFA prevalence of 11.9%, pose a potential risk for reintroduction of LF into Togo while Ghanaian refugees and seasonal economic migrants do not appear to pose a significant risk. Periodic monitoring of migrants, especially the nomadic Peuhl population, is a potential post-validation surveillance approach that could be used to promptly detect any LF cluster that may arise.

Indexed as

Epidemiological MonitoringPublic HealthAdolescentAdultAnimalsChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesElephantiasis, FilarialFemaleFilaricidesHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleMass Drug AdministrationFilaricidesLymphatic filariasisMigrants groupPost-validation surveillanceTogo

Identifiers

PMID33653393
PMCPMC7923304

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.