Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33653331›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2021

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of eliminating cervical cancer through a tailored optimal pathway: a modeling study.

Changfa Xia, Xiaoqian Xu, Xuelian Zhao, Shangying Hu, Youlin Qiao, Yong Zhang, Raymond Hutubessy, Partha Basu, Nathalie Broutet, Mark Jit and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The 2Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2024
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Strategies to accelerate the elimination of cervical cancer in British Columbia, Canada: a modelling study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Changfa XiaNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Pan-jia-yuan South Lane, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
Xiaoqian XuNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Pan-jia-yuan South Lane, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
Xuelian ZhaoNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Pan-jia-yuan South Lane, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
Shangying HuNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Pan-jia-yuan South Lane, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
Youlin QiaoNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Pan-jia-yuan South Lane, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
Yong ZhangNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Pan-jia-yuan South Lane, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China.
Raymond HutubessyDepartment of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals (IVB), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Partha BasuScreening Group, Early Detection and Prevention Section, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
Nathalie BroutetDepartment of Reproductive Health and Research - WHO Special Research Programme on Human Reproduction (HRP), World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mark JitDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Fanghui ZhaoNational Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No.17 Pan-jia-yuan South Lane, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China. zhaofangh@cicams.ac.cn.
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College · CNWorld Health Organization · CHCentre International de Recherche sur le Cancer · FRUniversity of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Assembly has adopted a global strategy to eliminate cervical cancer. However, neither the optimal pathway nor the corresponding economic and health benefits have been evaluated. We take China as an example to assess the optimal pathway towards elimination and the cost-effectiveness of tailored actions.

methodsA validated hybrid model was used to assess the costs and benefits of alternative strategies combining human papillomavirus vaccination, cervical screening, and treatment of pre-invasive lesions and invasive cancer for females with different immunization history. All Chinese females living or projected to be born during 2015-2100, under projected trends in aging, urbanization, and sexual activity, were considered. Optimal strategies were determined by cost-effectiveness efficiency frontiers. Primary outcomes were cervical cancer cases and deaths averted and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). We employed a lifetime horizon from a societal perspective. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses evaluate model uncertainty.

resultsThe optimal pathway represents an integration of multiple tailored strategies from females with different immunization history. If China adopts the optimal pathway, the age-standardized incidence of cervical cancer is predicted to decrease to fewer than four new cases per 100,000 women (i.e., elimination) by 2047 (95% confidence interval 2043 to 2050). Compared to the status quo, the optimal pathway would avert a total of 7,509,192 (6,922,744 to 8,359,074) cervical cancer cases and 2,529,873 (2,366,826 to 2,802,604) cervical cancer deaths in 2021-2100, with the discounted ICER being $- 339 (- 687 to - 79) per quality-adjusted life-year.

conclusionsBy adopting an optimal pathway from 2021 (namely, the year of the first Chinese Centennial Goals) onwards, cervical cancer could be eliminated by the late 2040s (namely, ahead of the second Chinese Centennial Goals) while saving net economic costs in China.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultChildCost-Benefit AnalysisEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMiddle AgedModels, TheoreticalUterine Cervical NeoplasmsYoung AdultCervical cancerCost-effectivenessEliminationOptimal pathway

Identifiers

PMID33653331
PMCPMC7927373
OpenAlexW3135366096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.