Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33653279›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health and preventive medicine2021

Reproducibility and validity of food group intake in a short food frequency questionnaire for the middle-aged Japanese population.

Nahomi Imaeda, Chiho Goto, Tae Sasakabe, Haruo Mikami, Isao Oze, Akihiro Hosono, Mariko Naito, Naoko Miyagawa, Etsuko Ozaki, Hiroaki Ikezaki and 9 more

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health and preventive medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Nahomi ImaedaDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Wellness, Shigakkan University, Obu, Aichi, Japan. imaeda@sgk.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3106-3488
Chiho GotoDepartment of Public Health, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Tae SasakabeDepartment of Public Health, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Aichi, Japan.
Haruo MikamiCancer Prevention Center, Chiba Cancer Center Research Institute, Chiba, Chiba, Japan.
Isao OzeDivision of Epidemiology and Prevention, Aichi Cancer Center Research Institute, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Akihiro HosonoDepartment of Public Health, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Mariko NaitoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.
Naoko MiyagawaDepartment of Public Health, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan.
Etsuko OzakiDepartment of Epidemiology for Community Health and Medicine, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan.
Hiroaki IkezakiDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Fukuoka, Japan.
Hinako NanriSection of Behavioral Physiology, Department of Physical Activity Research, National Institutes of Health and Nutrition, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriko T NakahataDepartment of Health and Nutrition, Faculty of Nursing and Nutrition, University of Shimane, Hamada, Shimane, Japan.
Sakurako K KamanoDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Tokushima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima, Tokushima, Japan.
Kiyonori KurikiLaboratory of Public Health, Graduate School of Nutritional and Environmental Sciences, Shizuoka University, Shizuoka, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yuri T YaguchiDepartment of Advanced Cancer Science, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Yamagata, Japan.
Takamasa KayamaDepartment of Advanced Cancer Science, Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Yamagata, Japan.
Ayako KuriharaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
Sei HaradaDepartment of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Shinjuku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenji WakaiDepartment of Preventive Medicine, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan.

Funding

Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas 17015018Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research on Priority Areas and Innovative Areas 221S0001Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 15H02524Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 16H06277Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24501007Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 26860421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and validity of a short food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) for food group intake in Japan, the reproducibility and partial validity of which were previously confirmed for nutrients.

methodsA total of 288 middle-aged healthy volunteers from 11 different areas of Japan provided nonconsecutive 3-day weighed dietary records (DRs) at 3-month intervals over four seasons. We evaluated reproducibility based on the first (FFQ1) and second (FFQ2) questionnaires and their validity against the DRs by comparing the intake of 20 food groups. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients (SRs) were calculated between energy-adjusted intake from the FFQs and that from the DRs.

resultsThe intake of 20 food groups estimated from the two FFQs was mostly equivalent. The median energy-adjusted SRs between the FFQ1 and FFQ2 were 0.61 (range 0.38-0.86) for men and 0.66 (0.45-0.84) for women. For validity, the median de-attenuated SRs between DRs and the FFQ1 were 0.51 (0.17-0.76) for men and 0.47 (0.23-0.77) for women. Compared with the DRs, the proportion of cross-classification into exact plus adjacent quintiles with the FFQ1 ranged from 58 to 86% in men and from 57 to 86% in women. According to the robust Z scores and the Bland-Altman plot graphs, the underestimation errors in the FFQ1 tended to be greater in individuals with high mean levels of consumption for meat for men and for other vegetables for both men and women.

conclusionThe FFQ demonstrated high reproducibility and reasonable validity for food group intake. This questionnaire is short and remains appropriate for identifying associations between diet and health/disease among adults in Japan.

Indexed as

Diet SurveysAdultAgedDietEnergy IntakeFemaleFoodHealthy VolunteersHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsCohort studyDietary surveyFood frequency questionnaireJapaneseReproducibilityValidity

Identifiers

PMID33653279
PMCPMC7923820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.