Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33653276›Full record

ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2021

Is body mass index (BMI) or body adiposity index (BAI) a better indicator to estimate body fat and selected cardiometabolic risk factors in adults with intellectual disabilities?

Anna Zwierzchowska, Diana Celebańska, Barbara Rosołek, Krystyna Gawlik, Aleksandra Żebrowska

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Anna ZwierzchowskaInstitute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, ul. Mikołowska 72a, 40-065, Katowice, Poland.
Diana CelebańskaInstitute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, ul. Mikołowska 72a, 40-065, Katowice, Poland. d.celebanska@awf.katowice.pl.ORCID 0000-0001-7657-7015
Barbara RosołekInstitute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, ul. Mikołowska 72a, 40-065, Katowice, Poland.
Krystyna GawlikPhysiotherapy Department, The Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education in Biala Podlaska, Sidorska 95/97, 21-500, Biała Podlaska, Poland.
Aleksandra ŻebrowskaInstitute of Sport Sciences, The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice, ul. Mikołowska 72a, 40-065, Katowice, Poland.
Akademii Wychowania Fizycznego im. Jerzego Kukuczki w Katowicach · PLAkademia Bialska im. Jana Pawła II · PL

Funding

The Jerzy Kukuczka Academy of Physical Education in Katowice AWF/INS/ZB2/2020
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe BMI index cannot always be used in people with intellectual disabilities due to neuromuscular coordination disorders and psychological barriers that may hinder conventional body weight measurement. The study aimed to assess the usefulness of BMI and BAI in estimating obesity and body fat in people with intellectual disabilities.

methodsThe first stage of the research involved 161 people with profound intellectual disabilities. Somatic parameters (BM, BH, WC, HC) were measured and BMI, BAI, WHR were calculated. Fifty seven persons with above-normal BMI and BAI were included in the second stage of the study and biochemical parameters were determined (TC, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, TG, GL).

resultsAccording to both BMI and BAI classifications, most people were overweight or obese. A high correlation of %BF with BMI and BAI indices was observed (r = 0.78). The sensitivity of both indices was 95.65%. In groups with above-normal BMI and BAI, an upward trend was found for mean values of TC, LDL, TG, and GL, with a simultaneous downward trend for HDL. Statistically significant intergroup differences were recorded for TG and GL (p < 0.05) for both indices (BMI and BAI).

conclusionsOur research demonstrated that BAI is complementary to BMI and can be recommended for the estimation of body fat and cardiometabolic risks in people with intellectual disabilities. Due to the ease of measurement, BAI has high utility value.

Indexed as

AdiposityBody Mass IndexPersons with Intellectual DisabilitiesAdultAge FactorsCardiometabolic Risk FactorsFemaleHumansIntellectual DisabilityMaleMetabolic SyndromeObesityPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsRisk AssessmentWaist-Hip RatioBody adiposity indexBody mass indexCardiometabolic riskIntellectual disabilities

Identifiers

PMID33653276
PMCPMC7927267
OpenAlexW3134631277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.