Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33653129›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2021

Covariation in population trends and demography reveals targets for conservation action.

Catriona A Morrison, Simon J Butler, Robert A Robinson, Jacquie A Clark, Juan Arizaga, Ainars Aunins, Oriol Baltà, Jaroslav Cepák, Tomasz Chodkiewicz, Virginia Escandell and 20 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Catriona A MorrisonSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Simon J ButlerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.
Robert A RobinsonBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford IP24 2PU, UK.
Jacquie A ClarkBritish Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford IP24 2PU, UK.
Juan ArizagaDepartment of Ornithology, Aranzadi Sciences Society, Zorroagagaina 11, E20014 Donostia, Spain.
Ainars AuninsDepartment of Zoology and Animal Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Latvia, Jelgavas iela 1, Riga, LV-1004, Latvia.
Oriol BaltàCatalan Ornithological Institute, Nat-Museu de Ciències Naturals de Barcelona, Pl. Leonardo da Vinci, 4-5 08019 Barcelona, Spain.
Jaroslav CepákBird Ringing Centre, National Museum, Hornoměcholupská 34, CZ-10200 Praha 10, Czech Republic.
Tomasz ChodkiewiczMuseum and Institute of Zoology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Wilcza 64, 00-679 Warszawa, Poland.
Virginia EscandellEstudio y Seguimiento de Aves SEO/BirdLife, Melquíades Biencinto, Madrid, Spain.
Ruud P B FoppenSovon Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology, PO Box 6521, 6503 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Richard D GregoryRSPB Centre for Conservation Science, The Lodge, Sandy SG19 2DL, UK.
Magne HusbyNord University, Røstad, 7600 Levanger, Norway.
Frédéric JiguetCentre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation (CESCO) UMR 7204, Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, France.
John Atle KålåsNorwegian Institute for Nature Research, PO Box 5685 Torgarden, NO-7485 Trondheim, Norway.
Aleksi LehikoinenFinnish Museum of Natural History, FI-00014 University of Helsinki, PO Box 17, Finland.
Åke LindströmDepartment of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Charlotte M MoshøjDansk Ornitologisk Forening, BirdLife Denmark, Vesterbrogade 138-140, DK-1620 København V, Denmark.
Károly NagyMME BirdLife Hungary, Monitoring Centre, H-4401 Nyiregyháza 1. PO Box 286, Hungary.
Arantza Leal NebotSEO/BirdLife, Ciencia Ciudadana, C/Melquiades Biencinto, 34 - 28053 Madrid, Spain.
Markus PihaFinnish Museum of Natural History - LUOMUS, PO Box 17, FI-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland.
Jiří ReifInstitute for Environmental Studies, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Prague, Benatska 2, 128 01 Praha 2, Czech Republic.
Thomas SattlerSwiss Ornithological Institute, Seerose 1, CH-6204 Sempach, Switzerland.
Jana ŠkorpilováPan-European Common Bird Monitoring Scheme, Czech Society for Ornithology, Na Bělidle, CZ-150 00 Prague 5, Czech Republic.
Tibor SzépUniversity of Nyíregyháza & MME/BirdLife Hungary, Nyíregyháza, Hungary.
Norbert TeufelbauerBirdLife Österreich, Museumsplatz 1/10/7-8, A-1070 Wien, Austria.
Kasper ThorupCenter for Macroecology, Evolution and Climate, Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Universitetsparken 15, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
Chris van TurnhoutSovon Dutch Centre for Field Ornithology, PO Box 6521, 6503 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Thomas WenningerSwedish Museum of Natural History, Bird Ringing Centre, Box 50007, S-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden.
Jennifer A GillSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wildlife conservation policies directed at common and widespread, but declining, species are difficult to design and implement effectively, as multiple environmental changes are likely to contribute to population declines. Conservation actions ultimately aim to influence demographic rates, but targeting actions towards feasible improvements in these is challenging in widespread species with ranges that encompass a wide range of environmental conditions. Across Europe, sharp declines in the abundance of migratory landbirds have driven international calls for action, but actions that could feasibly contribute to population recovery have yet to be identified. Targeted actions to improve conditions on poor-quality sites could be an effective approach, but only if local conditions consistently influence local demography and hence population trends. Using long-term measures of abundance and demography of breeding birds at survey sites across Europe, we show that co-occurring species with differing migration behaviours have similar directions of local population trends and magnitudes of productivity, but not survival rates. Targeted actions to boost local productivity within Europe, alongside large-scale (non-targeted) environmental protection across non-breeding ranges, could therefore help address the urgent need to halt migrant landbird declines. Such demographic routes to recovery are likely to be increasingly needed to address global wildlife declines.

Indexed as

Animal MigrationBirdsAnimalsConservation of Natural ResourcesEuropePopulation Dynamicsconservationdemographymigrationpopulation trendsproductivity

Identifiers

PMID33653129
PMCPMC7934962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.