Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33653012›Full record

ReviewPolymers2021

Understanding the Barrier and Mechanical Behavior of Different Nanofillers in Chitosan Films for Food Packaging.

João Pires, Camila Damásio de Paula, Victor Gomes Lauriano Souza, Ana Luísa Fernando, Isabel Coelhoso

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Polymers, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 137 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

João PiresMEtRICs, Departamento de Ciências e Tecnologia da Biomassa, NOVA School of Science andTechnology FCT NOVA, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-1849-0349
Camila Damásio de PaulaFaculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas, Universidade de São Paulo, Av. Prof. Lineu Prestes 580, CEP, 05508-900 São Paulo-SP, Brazil.
Victor Gomes Lauriano SouzaMEtRICs, Departamento de Ciências e Tecnologia da Biomassa, NOVA School of Science andTechnology FCT NOVA, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-8381-9780
Ana Luísa FernandoMEtRICs, Departamento de Ciências e Tecnologia da Biomassa, NOVA School of Science andTechnology FCT NOVA, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-9270-3982
Isabel CoelhosoLAQV-REQUIMTE, Departamento de Química, NOVA School of Science and Technology FCT NOVA, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Campus de Caparica, 2829-516 Caparica, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0001-7032-3436
Universidade Nova de Lisboa · PTInternational Iberian Nanotechnology Laboratory · PTRede de Química e Tecnologia · PTUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

Associate Laboratory for Green Chemistry - LAQV FCT/MCTES (UIDB/50006/2020 and UIDP/50006/2020Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia SFRH/BD/144346/2019Mechanical Engineering and Resource Sustainability Center - METRiCs FCT/MCTES (UIDB/04077/2020)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The continuous petroleum-based plastics manufacturing generates disposal issues, spreading the problem of plastic pollution and its rise in the environment. Recently, innovative techniques and scientific research promoted biopolymers as the primary alternative for traditional plastics, raising and expanding global bioplastic production. Due to its unmatched biological and functional attributes, chitosan (Ch) has been substantially explored and employed as a biopolymeric matrix. Nevertheless, the hydrophilicity and the weak mechanical properties associated with this biopolymer represent a significant intrinsic restriction to its implementation into some commercial applications, namely, in food packaging industries. Distinct methodologies have been utilized to upgrade the mechanical and barrier properties of Ch, such as using organic or inorganic nanofillers, crosslinkers, or blends with other polymers. This review intends to analyze the most recent works that combine the action of different nanoparticle types with Ch films to reinforce their mechanical and barrier properties.

Indexed as

bionanocompositesbiopolymerfood packagingmechanical propertiesoxygen permeabilitywater vapor permeability

Identifiers

PMID33653012
PMCPMC7956210
OpenAlexW3134491737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.