Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33652829›Full record

ArticleViruses2021

Attitudes towards Anti-SARS-CoV2 Vaccination among Healthcare Workers: Results from a National Survey in Italy.

Francesco Di Gennaro, Rita Murri, Francesco Vladimiro Segala, Lorenzo Cerruti, Amina Abdulle, Annalisa Saracino, Davide Fiore Bavaro, Massimo Fantoni

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Viruses, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 113 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
113citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
19.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

113 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Vaccine hesitancy among primary care health workers in Campo Grande, after the COVID-19 pandemic.Epidemiologia e servicos de saude : revista do Sistema Unico de Saude do Brasil · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

53 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco Di GennaroClinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3453-5647
Rita MurriClinic of Infectious Diseases, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9468-5458
Francesco Vladimiro SegalaClinic of Infectious Diseases, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5276-2603
Lorenzo CerrutiDipartimento di medicina, University of Padua, 35121 Padua, Italy.
Amina AbdulleDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino Hospital, University of Turin, 10124 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5571-097X
Annalisa SaracinoClinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy.
Davide Fiore BavaroClinic of Infectious Diseases, University of Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4833-7118
Massimo FantoniClinic of Infectious Diseases, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, 00168 Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-6913-8460
Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has afflicted tens of millions of people, fostering and unprecedent effort in vaccine development and distribution. Healthcare workers (HCW) play a key role in vaccine promotion and patient guidance, and it is likely that hesitancy among this population will have a major impact on the adoption of a successful immunization policy. To investigate HCW attitudes towards anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) vaccination, we developed an anonymous online cross-sectional survey. 1723 Italian HCW responded. Overall, 1155 (67%) intended to be vaccinated, while 443 (26%) were not sure and 125 (7%) declared refusal. In multivariate analysis, factors associated with hesitancy were using Facebook as the main information source and being a non-physician HCW, while predictors of acceptance included younger age, being in close contact with high-risk groups and having received flu vaccination during the 2019-2020 season. Reasons for hesitancy included lack of trust in vaccine safety (85%) and receiving little (78%) or conflicting (69%) information about vaccines. According to our results, adequate investment in vaccine education for healthcare personnel appears to be urgently needed, prioritizing non-physicians and information quality spread through social media. We hope that our data could help governments and policy-makers to target communication in the ongoing COVID-19 vaccination campaign.

Indexed as

AdultCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth PersonnelHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesVaccination RefusalCOVID-19 VaccinesCOVID-19cross-sectional surveyhealthcare workersinfectious diseasesvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID33652829
PMCPMC7996832
OpenAlexW3134808461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.