Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33652810›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of neonatal screening2021

Informing Parents about Newborn Screening: A European Comparison Study.

Amber IJzebrink, Tessa van Dijk, Věra Franková, Gerard Loeber, Viktor Kožich, Lidewij Henneman, Marleen Jansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of neonatal screening, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amber IJzebrinkDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7699-4521
Tessa van DijkDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2334-9278
Věra FrankováDepartment of Pediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Charles University First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital Praque, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0002-1927-9596
Gerard LoeberInternational Society for Neonatal Screening, 3721CK Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Viktor KožichDepartment of Pediatrics and Inherited Metabolic Disorders, Charles University First Faculty of Medicine and General University Hospital Praque, 128 08 Prague 2, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0001-5820-5277
Lidewij HennemanDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3531-0597
Marleen JansenDepartment of Clinical Genetics, Section Community Genetics, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7847-683X

Funding

International Society of Neonatal Screening (ISNS) Project Patient information internationally.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge about newborn screening (NBS) is an important factor for parents to make an informed decision about participation. In Europe, countries inform parents differently about their NBS program, potentially including different knowledge aspects in their information. The aim of this study was to assess twenty-six European parental information products and to analyze their knowledge aspects through a content analysis. The analyzed aspects were compared to a list of eight knowledge aspects from scientific literature. The list includes aspects important for parents' decision-making, such as the purpose of screening. The study showed that most of the eight knowledge aspects are included in NBS information products of the majority of countries. However, there were differences between countries, for example in the amount of detail and phrasing of the information. Additional relevant knowledge aspects have also been identified and are recommended to optimize information products, such as the handling of residual bloodspot samples. This study only assessed knowledge aspects in information products meant for printing, but many countries also use other communication methods, and the impact on knowledge of the delivery of the information needs further study. Preferences of parents on alternative communication methods need to be considered and evaluated on their effectiveness.

Indexed as

European information productsinformed decisionknowledge aspectsnewborn screening (NBS)parental information

Identifiers

PMID33652810
PMCPMC7930998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.