Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33652769›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2021

Implementation of Bio-Risk Management System in a National Clinical and Medical Referral Centre Laboratories.

Fatma Lestari, Abdul Kadir, Thariq Miswary, Cynthia Febrina Maharani, Anom Bowolaksono, Debby Paramitasari

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 36% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Implementation of a Biorisk Management System in Armenia for ISO 35001:2019 Certification.Applied biosafety : journal of the American Biological Safety Association · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Analysis of Bio-Risk Management System Implementation in Indonesian Higher Education Laboratory.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fatma LestariOccupational Health and Safety Department, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok West Java 16424, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-1389-4360
Abdul KadirOccupational Health and Safety Department, Faculty of Public Health, Universitas Indonesia, Depok West Java 16424, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0001-6597-4082
Thariq MiswaryNational Clinical and Medical Referral Centre Laboratories, Bekasi 17111, Indonesia.
Cynthia Febrina MaharaniOccupational and Environmental Health Department, Public Health Faculty, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.
Anom BowolaksonoDisaster Risk Reduction Centre (DRRC), Universitas Indonesia, Depok West Java 16424, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-3180-1460
Debby ParamitasariDisaster Risk Reduction Centre (DRRC), Universitas Indonesia, Depok West Java 16424, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-1782-6250
University of Indonesia · IDNational Brain Centre · IDUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing threats from biological agents have become a concern in laboratories, and emerging infectious diseases have demanded increased awareness and preparedness of laboratory facilities. Bio-risk assessment is needed to provide a framework for organisations to establish a comprehensive bio-risk management system. The assessment criteria should include both biosafety and biosecurity measures. Laboratories in Indonesia play a significant role in public health interventions in term of disease screening, diagnosis and medical decision making. The National Clinical and Medical Referral Centre Laboratories have the potential of daily exposures to dangerous biological materials. This study aims to identify the gap between bio-risk management system implementation and International Standard Organisation (ISO) 35001:2019 requirements. The 202 items in ISO 35001:2019 are categorized into seven main elements. The findings show that more than half of the elements on ISO 35001:2019 have been implemented in these centres. Good performance was identified at lab 4 and 5 which obtained the highest scores, particularly in the context of organisation, planning, operation and improvement elements. However, the widest gap was found in leadership, support and performance evaluation. One way to address this would be to create written rules and regulations at the laboratory top management level to require all laboratory facilities to comply to the bio-risk policies, rules, and regulations.

Indexed as

Containment of BiohazardsLaboratoriesIndonesiaReferral and ConsultationRisk Assessmentbio-riskgap analysisimplementationISO 35001:2019laboratorymanagement

Identifiers

PMID33652769
PMCPMC7956505
OpenAlexW3134711817

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.