Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33652673›Full record

ReviewNutrients2021

Current Evidence and Possible Future Applications of Creatine Supplementation for Older Adults.

Darren G Candow, Scott C Forbes, Ben Kirk, Gustavo Duque

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nutrients, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Creatine monohydrate supplementation for older adults and clinical populations.Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Ucp1 Ablation Improves Skeletal Muscle Glycolytic Function in Aging Mice.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Darren G CandowFaculty of Kinesiology and Health Studies, University of Regina, Regina SK S4SOA2, Canada.
Scott C ForbesFaculty of Education, Department of Physical Education Studies, Brandon University, Brandon MB R7A6A9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-6896-5552
Ben KirkDepartment of Medicine-Western Health, the University of Melbourne, VIC, 3021, Australia.
Gustavo DuqueDepartment of Medicine-Western Health, the University of Melbourne, VIC, 3021, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8126-0637
The University of Melbourne · AUBrandon University · CAUniversity of Regina · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sarcopenia, defined as age-related reduction in muscle mass, strength, and physical performance, is associated with other age-related health conditions such as osteoporosis, osteosarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, physical frailty, and cachexia. From a healthy aging perspective, lifestyle interventions that may help overcome characteristics and associated comorbidities of sarcopenia are clinically important. One possible intervention is creatine supplementation (CR). Accumulating research over the past few decades shows that CR, primarily when combined with resistance training (RT), has favourable effects on aging muscle, bone and fat mass, muscle and bone strength, and tasks of physical performance in healthy older adults. However, research is very limited regarding the efficacy of CR in older adults with sarcopenia or osteoporosis and no research exists in older adults with osteosarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, physical frailty, or cachexia. Therefore, the purpose of this narrative review is (1) to evaluate and summarize current research involving CR, with and without RT, on properties of muscle and bone in older adults and (2) to provide a rationale and justification for future research involving CR in older adults with osteosarcopenia, sarcopenic obesity, physical frailty, or cachexia.

Indexed as

Dietary SupplementsAgedAged, 80 and overAgingBone DensityCreatineExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthOsteoporosisResistance TrainingSarcopeniaCreatinecachexiafrailtyosteoporosisosteosarcopeniasarcopenia

Identifiers

PMID33652673
PMCPMC7996960
OpenAlexW3135876393

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.