Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33652631›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2021

A Comparison Study of the Caecum Microbial Profiles, Productivity and Production Quality of Broiler Chickens Fed Supplements Based on Medium Chain Fatty and Organic Acids.

Agila Dauksiene, Modestas Ruzauskas, Romas Gruzauskas, Paulina Zavistanaviciute, Vytaute Starkute, Vita Lele, Dovile Klupsaite, Jolita Klementaviciute, Elena Bartkiene

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Overview of the Use of Probiotics in Poultry Production.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  13. FeedingFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  14. Frontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Agila DauksieneInstitute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes str. 18, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-5815-9749
Modestas RuzauskasDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes str. 18, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0002-1040-0249
Romas GruzauskasDepartment of Food Sciences and Technology, Kaunas University of Technology, Radvilenu str. 19, LT-50254 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Paulina ZavistanaviciuteInstitute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes str. 18, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Vytaute StarkuteInstitute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes str. 18, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Vita LeleInstitute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes str. 18, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Dovile KlupsaiteInstitute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes str. 18, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Jolita KlementaviciuteInstitute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes str. 18, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Elena BartkieneInstitute of Animal Rearing Technologies, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Tilzes str. 18, LT-47181 Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID 0000-0003-3706-1280
Lithuanian University of Health Sciences · LTKaunas University of Technology · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of medium chain fatty acids (MCFAs) and organic acids (OAs) supplements on the caecum microbial profiles, productivity and production quality characteristics of broiler chickens (BCs). BC (900 chicks) were attributed to three groups: (i) control; (ii) MCFAs group (BCs fed with feed supplemented with MCFAs); (iii) OAs group (BCs fed with feed supplemented with OAs). Broilers were slaughtered at the end of the trial (42 days old), and the caecum microbial profiles, productivity and production quality characteristics were analysed. Supplementation with OAs resulted in a more appropriate environment in the caecum for beneficial microorganisms than with a diet supplemented with MCFAs. This was supported by data on the presence of higher amounts and an increased species variety of probiotic bacteria (

Indexed as

caecum microbial profilesmicrobiomepoultryproduction qualityproductivity characteristics

Identifiers

PMID33652631
PMCPMC7996795
OpenAlexW3133561148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.