Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33652527›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2021

Are changes in behavior of fast-growing broilers with slight gait impairment (GS0-2) related to pain?

Anja B Riber, Mette S Herskin, Leslie Foldager, Atefeh Berenjian, Dale A Sandercock, Jo Murrell, Fernanda M Tahamtani

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of Growth Rate on the Welfare of Broilers.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Welfare of broilers on farm.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Anja B RiberDepartment of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark. Electronic address: anja.riber@anis.au.dk.
Mette S HerskinDepartment of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark.
Leslie FoldagerDepartment of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark; Bioinformatics Research Centre, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Atefeh BerenjianDepartment of Animal and Poultry Science, College of Aburaihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
Dale A SandercockAnimal and Veterinary Sciences, Scotland's Rural College (SRUC), Midlothian, UK.
Jo MurrellBristol Veterinary School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Fernanda M TahamtaniDepartment of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Tjele, Denmark; Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Aarhus University · DKScotland's Rural College · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Tehran · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impaired walking ability in terms of slight or definite defects is more common in broiler production than lameness that obviously hinders movement, but it has received limited scientific attention. This study aimed to compare behavior of conventional broilers with impaired walking ability (assessed as gait score (GS) 2) with those walking normally (GS0) and those with only a slight gait defect (GS1). Behavior in the home environment was registered, and an analgesic intervention to quantify changes in time budgets indicating pain relief was applied. The study included 192 Ross 308 broilers. On day 27 of age, the birds were distributed as evenly as possible into birds of GS0 and GS2 of each sex based on obtained gait score. Following this, each experimental bird was housed with 3 companion birds. On days 30 and 32 of age, the behavior in the home pens was recorded. All experimental birds were injected with the NSAID carprofen on one of the 2 d and saline on the other. The statistical analyses used the GS scored on the day of recording as explanatory factor. Compared to GS0 birds, GS2 birds tended to be more inactive (mean (CI): 4,193 (3,971-4416) vs. 4,005 (3,753-4,257) s; P = 0.074), spent more time sitting while feeding (306 (266-353) vs. 213 (180-251) s; P = 0.026), were less likely to perch (probability: 0.78 (0.69-0.85) vs. 0.91 (0.85-0.95); P = 0.012), and spent less time performing comfort behavior (749 (689-814) s vs. 875 (792-967) s; P = 0.043). Compared to GS1 birds, GS2 birds spent more time inactive (GS1: 4,022 (3,818-4225) s; P = 0.027), less time foraging (289 (253-329) vs. 347 (309-388) s; P = 0.047), and were less likely to perch (GS1: 0.90 (0.86-0.93); P = 0.001). For some of these behavioral variables, administration of carprofen led to behavioral changes across the GSs, which may suggest that the behavioral expression of the broilers was limited by pain. These findings are of relevance to animal welfare, but the underlying causes are still not fully clarified.

Indexed as

Animal WelfareBehavior, AnimalChickensGaitLameness, AnimalPainAnimalsWalkingbehaviorbroilergaitpainwalking impairment

Identifiers

PMID33652527
PMCPMC7936190
OpenAlexW3120401120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.