Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33652421›Full record

ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2021

A GPU-accelerated framework for rapid estimation of scanner-specific scatter in CT for virtual imaging trials.

Shobhit Sharma, Ehsan Abadi, Anuj Kapadia, W Paul Segars, Ehsan Samei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A systematic assessment of photon-counting CT for bone mineral density and microarchitecture quantifications.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Development and Clinical Applications of a Virtual Imaging Framework for Optimizing Photon-counting CT.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shobhit SharmaCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, NC, United States of America.
Ehsan AbadiCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-9123-5854
Anuj KapadiaCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, NC, United States of America.
W Paul SegarsCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, NC, United States of America.
Ehsan SameiCarl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Department of Radiology, NC, United States of America.

Funding

TR&D Project 3: Virtual ReadersP41EB028744 · NIBIB · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Ehsan Samei · 2021 to 2026
$7.8M
Simulation Tools for Dynamic CTR01EB001838 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SAMEI, EHSAN, SEGARS, WILLIAM P · 2005 to 2023
$6.9M
Precision Cardiac CT: Development of a Computational Platform for Optimizing ImagingR01HL131753 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SAMEI, EHSAN, SEGARS, WILLIAM P · 2017 to 2020
$2.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL131753NIBIB NIH HHS P41 EB028744NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001838
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Virtual imaging trials (VITs), defined as the process of conducting clinical imaging trials using computer simulations, offer a time- and cost-effective alternative to traditional imaging trials for CT. The clinical potential of VITs hinges on the realism of simulations modeling the image acquisition process, where the accurate scanner-specific simulation of scatter in a time-feasible manner poses a particular challenge. To meet this need, this study proposes, develops, and validates a rapid scatter estimation framework, based on GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and denoising methods, for estimating scatter in single source, dual-source, and photon-counting CT. A CT simulator was developed to incorporate parametric models for an anti-scatter grid and a curved energy integrating detector with an energy-dependent response. The scatter estimates from the simulator were validated using physical measurements acquired on a clinical CT system using the standard single-blocker method. The MC simulator was further extended to incorporate a pre-validated model for a PCD and an additional source-detector pair to model cross scatter in dual-source configurations. To estimate scatter with desirable levels of statistical noise using a manageable computational load, two denoising methods using a (1) convolutional neural network and an (2) optimized Gaussian filter were further deployed. The viability of this framework for clinical VITs was assessed by integrating it with a scanner-specific ray-tracer program to simulate images for an image quality (Mercury) and an anthropomorphic phantom (XCAT). The simulated scatter-to-primary ratios agreed with physical measurements within 4.4% ± 10.8% across all projection angles and kVs. The differences of ∼121 HU between images with and without scatter, signifying the importance of scatter for simulating clinical images. The denoising methods preserved the magnitudes and trends observed in the reference scatter distributions, with an averaged rRMSE value of 0.91 and 0.97 for the two methods, respectively. The execution time of ∼30 s for simulating scatter in a single projection with a desirable level of statistical noise indicates a major improvement in performance, making our tool an eligible candidate for conducting extensive VITs spanning multiple patients and scan protocols.

Indexed as

Cone-Beam Computed TomographyComputer SimulationHumansMonte Carlo MethodPhantoms, ImagingScattering, Radiationcomputed tomographydual sourceMonte Carlophoton countingscattervirtual imaging trials

Identifiers

PMID33652421
PMCPMC8381286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.