ArticlePhysics in medicine and biology2021
A GPU-accelerated framework for rapid estimation of scanner-specific scatter in CT for virtual imaging trials.
Article in Physics in medicine and biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Accuracy of Noise Measurements in Patient CT Images.Academic radiology · 2026Article
- An in silico evaluation of signal and separability properties of k-edge materials in spectral CT.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Sensitivity analysis of key CT simulation parameters and their impact on quality of virtual images.Medical physics · 2025Article
- Effects of Intra-patient Lung Volume Variability on CT-Based Emphysema Quantification: A Virtual Imaging Study.Academic radiology · 2025Article
- XCAT 3.0: A comprehensive library of personalized digital twins derived from CT scans.Medical image analysis · 2025Article
- In silico modeling of a clinical photon-counting CT system: Verification and validation.Medical physics · 2025Article
- The potential of photon-counting CT for the improved precision of lung nodule radiomics.Physics in medicine and biology · 2025Article
- A framework to model charge sharing and pulse pileup for virtual imaging trials of photon-counting CT.Physics in medicine and biology · 2024Article
- A systematic assessment and optimization of photon-counting CT for lung density quantifications.Medical physics · 2024Article
- Dual-energy computed tomography imaging with megavoltage and kilovoltage X-ray spectra.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Deep silicon photon-counting CT: A first simulation-based study for assessing perceptual benefits across diverse anatomies.European journal of radiology · 2024Article
- A systematic assessment of photon-counting CT for bone mineral density and microarchitecture quantifications.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2023Article
- A scanner-specific framework for simulating CT images with tube current modulation.Physics in medicine and biology · 2021Article
- Development and Clinical Applications of a Virtual Imaging Framework for Optimizing Photon-counting CT.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical EngineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Virtual imaging trials (VITs), defined as the process of conducting clinical imaging trials using computer simulations, offer a time- and cost-effective alternative to traditional imaging trials for CT. The clinical potential of VITs hinges on the realism of simulations modeling the image acquisition process, where the accurate scanner-specific simulation of scatter in a time-feasible manner poses a particular challenge. To meet this need, this study proposes, develops, and validates a rapid scatter estimation framework, based on GPU-accelerated Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and denoising methods, for estimating scatter in single source, dual-source, and photon-counting CT. A CT simulator was developed to incorporate parametric models for an anti-scatter grid and a curved energy integrating detector with an energy-dependent response. The scatter estimates from the simulator were validated using physical measurements acquired on a clinical CT system using the standard single-blocker method. The MC simulator was further extended to incorporate a pre-validated model for a PCD and an additional source-detector pair to model cross scatter in dual-source configurations. To estimate scatter with desirable levels of statistical noise using a manageable computational load, two denoising methods using a (1) convolutional neural network and an (2) optimized Gaussian filter were further deployed. The viability of this framework for clinical VITs was assessed by integrating it with a scanner-specific ray-tracer program to simulate images for an image quality (Mercury) and an anthropomorphic phantom (XCAT). The simulated scatter-to-primary ratios agreed with physical measurements within 4.4% ± 10.8% across all projection angles and kVs. The differences of ∼121 HU between images with and without scatter, signifying the importance of scatter for simulating clinical images. The denoising methods preserved the magnitudes and trends observed in the reference scatter distributions, with an averaged rRMSE value of 0.91 and 0.97 for the two methods, respectively. The execution time of ∼30 s for simulating scatter in a single projection with a desirable level of statistical noise indicates a major improvement in performance, making our tool an eligible candidate for conducting extensive VITs spanning multiple patients and scan protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.