Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33652376›Full record

SynthesisNeuroImage. Clinical2021

Ultra-high field magnetic resonance imaging in human epilepsy: A systematic review.

R H G J van Lanen, A J Colon, C J Wiggins, M C Hoeberigs, G Hoogland, A Roebroeck, D Ivanov, B A Poser, R P W Rouhl, P A M Hofman and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Toward Unified Biomarkers for Focal Epilepsy.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

R H G J van LanenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: rick.van.lanen@mumc.nl.
A J ColonAcademic Center for Epileptology, Kempenhaeghe/Maastricht University Medical Center, Heeze/Maastricht, The Netherlands.
C J WigginsScannexus, Ultra High Field MRI Research Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
M C HoeberigsDepartment of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
G HooglandDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Academic Center for Epileptology, Kempenhaeghe/Maastricht University Medical Center, Heeze/Maastricht, The Netherlands.
A RoebroeckDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
D IvanovDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
B A PoserDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
R P W RouhlSchool for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Academic Center for Epileptology, Kempenhaeghe/Maastricht University Medical Center, Heeze/Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
P A M HofmanSchool for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
J F A JansenSchool for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
W BackesSchool for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
K RijkersDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Academic Center for Epileptology, Kempenhaeghe/Maastricht University Medical Center, Heeze/Maastricht, The Netherlands.
O E M G SchijnsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNs), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Academic Center for Epileptology, Kempenhaeghe/Maastricht University Medical Center, Heeze/Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleResective epilepsy surgery is an evidence-based curative treatment option for patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. The major preoperative predictor of a good surgical outcome is detection of an epileptogenic lesion by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Application of ultra-high field (UHF) MRI, i.e. field strengths ≥ 7 Tesla (T), may increase the sensitivity to detect such a lesion.

methodsA keyword search strategy was submitted to Pubmed, EMBASE, Cochrane Database and clinicaltrials.gov to select studies on UHF MRI in patients with epilepsy. Follow-up study selection and data extraction were performed following PRISMA guidelines. We focused on I) diagnostic gain of UHF- over conventional MRI, II) concordance of MRI-detected lesion, seizure onset zone and surgical decision-making, and III) postoperative histopathological diagnosis and seizure outcome.

resultsSixteen observational cohort studies, all using 7T MRI were included. Diagnostic gain of 7T over conventional MRI ranged from 8% to 67%, with a pooled gain of 31%. Novel techniques to visualize pathological processes in epilepsy and lesion detection are discussed. Seizure freedom was achieved in 73% of operated patients; no seizure outcome comparison was made between 7T MRI positive, 7T negative and 3T positive patients. 7T could influence surgical decision-making, with high concordance of lesion and seizure onset zone. Focal cortical dysplasia (54%), hippocampal sclerosis (12%) and gliosis (8.1%) were the most frequently diagnosed histopathological entities. SIGNIFICANCE: UHF MRI increases, yet variably, the sensitivity to detect an epileptogenic lesion, showing potential for use in clinical practice. It remains to be established whether this results in improved seizure outcome after surgical treatment. Prospective studies with larger cohorts of epilepsy patients, uniform scan and sequence protocols, and innovative post-processing technology are equally important as further increasing field strengths. Besides technical ameliorations, improved correlation of imaging features with clinical semiology, histopathology and clinical outcome has to be established.

Indexed as

Drug Resistant EpilepsyEpilepsyFollow-Up StudiesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesTreatment Outcome7TEpilepsyMagnetic resonance imagingMRIUltra-high field

Identifiers

PMID33652376
PMCPMC7921009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.