Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33652164›Full record

ReviewActa biomaterialia2021

Design considerations for engineering 3D models to study vascular pathologies in vitro.

Suzette T Lust, Catherine M Shanahan, Rebecca J Shipley, Pablo Lamata, Eileen Gentleman

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Key parameters for designing robust 2D and 3D spheroid models forBioengineering & translational medicine · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Bioengineering vascularization.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suzette T LustCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom; School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Catherine M ShanahanSchool of Cardiovascular Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London SE5 9NU, United Kingdom.
Rebecca J ShipleyInstitute of Healthcare Engineering and Department of Mechanical Engineering, University College London, London WC1E 7JE, United Kingdom.
Pablo LamataSchool of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom.
Eileen GentlemanCentre for Craniofacial and Regenerative Biology, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, United Kingdom. Electronic address: eileen.gentleman@kcl.ac.uk.
King's College London · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation RE/18/2/34213Medical Research Council MR/N013700/1Wellcome Trust 209450Wellcome Trust 209450/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust WT203148/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are driven by pathological remodelling of blood vessels, which can lead to aneurysms, myocardial infarction, ischaemia and strokes. Aberrant remodelling is driven by changes in vascular cell behaviours combined with degradation, modification, or abnormal deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. The underlying mechanisms that drive the pathological remodelling of blood vessels are multifaceted and disease specific; however, unravelling them may be key to developing therapies. Reductionist models of blood vessels created in vitro that combine cells with biomaterial scaffolds may serve as useful analogues to study vascular disease progression in a controlled environment. This review presents the main considerations for developing such in vitro models. We discuss how the design of blood vessel models impacts experimental readouts, with a particular focus on the maintenance of normal cellular phenotypes, strategies that mimic normal cell-ECM interactions, and approaches that foster intercellular communication between vascular cell types. We also highlight how choice of biomaterials, cellular arrangements and the inclusion of mechanical stimulation using fluidic devices together impact the ability of blood vessel models to mimic in vivo conditions. In the future, by combining advances in materials science, cell biology, fluidics and modelling, it may be possible to create blood vessel models that are patient-specific and can be used to develop and test therapies. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Simplified models of blood vessels created in vitro are powerful tools for studying cardiovascular diseases and understanding the mechanisms driving their progression. Here, we highlight the key structural and cellular components of effective models and discuss how including mechanical stimuli allows researchers to mimic native vessel behaviour in health and disease. We discuss the primary methods used to form blood vessel models and their limitations and conclude with an outlook on how blood vessel models that incorporate patient-specific cells and flows can be used in the future for personalised disease modelling.

Indexed as

Extracellular MatrixTissue EngineeringBiocompatible MaterialsHumansTissue ScaffoldsBiocompatible Materials3D Vascular modelsBiomaterialsBlood vessel remodellingCardiovascular diseasePersonalised disease modelling

Identifiers

PMID33652164
PMCPMC7611653
OpenAlexW3135411383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.