ReviewActa biomaterialia2021
Design considerations for engineering 3D models to study vascular pathologies in vitro.
Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Automated Modular Platform for Vascular Graft Assessment via Coronary-like Flow-Induced Stimulation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Endothelial-smooth muscle microgauges for modeling pulmonary arterial vasoregulation.Lab on a chip · 2025Article
- Key parameters for designing robust 2D and 3D spheroid models forBioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
- Light-based 3D bioprinting techniques for illuminating the advances of vascular tissue engineering.Materials today. Bio · 2024Review
- Bioengineering vascularization.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2024Review
- Advances in medical polyesters for vascular tissue engineering.Discover nano · 2024Review
- A bypass flow model to study endothelial cell mechanotransduction across diverse flow environments.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Bridging the gap between in vitro and in vivo models: a way forward to clinical translation of mitochondrial transplantation in acute disease states.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
- Cadherin Expression Is Regulated by Mechanical Phenotypes of Fibroblasts in the Perivascular Matrix.Cells, tissues, organs · 2024Article
- Control of blood capillary networks and holes in blood-brain barrier models by regulating elastic modulus of scaffolds.Materials today. Bio · 2023Article
- 3D multicellular systems in disease modelling: From organoids to organ-on-chip.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023Review
- 3D bioprinting and photocrosslinking: emerging strategies & future perspectives.Biomaterials advances · 2022Review
- 3D Tissue-Engineered Vascular Drug Screening Platforms: Promise and Considerations.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Many cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are driven by pathological remodelling of blood vessels, which can lead to aneurysms, myocardial infarction, ischaemia and strokes. Aberrant remodelling is driven by changes in vascular cell behaviours combined with degradation, modification, or abnormal deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins. The underlying mechanisms that drive the pathological remodelling of blood vessels are multifaceted and disease specific; however, unravelling them may be key to developing therapies. Reductionist models of blood vessels created in vitro that combine cells with biomaterial scaffolds may serve as useful analogues to study vascular disease progression in a controlled environment. This review presents the main considerations for developing such in vitro models. We discuss how the design of blood vessel models impacts experimental readouts, with a particular focus on the maintenance of normal cellular phenotypes, strategies that mimic normal cell-ECM interactions, and approaches that foster intercellular communication between vascular cell types. We also highlight how choice of biomaterials, cellular arrangements and the inclusion of mechanical stimulation using fluidic devices together impact the ability of blood vessel models to mimic in vivo conditions. In the future, by combining advances in materials science, cell biology, fluidics and modelling, it may be possible to create blood vessel models that are patient-specific and can be used to develop and test therapies. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Simplified models of blood vessels created in vitro are powerful tools for studying cardiovascular diseases and understanding the mechanisms driving their progression. Here, we highlight the key structural and cellular components of effective models and discuss how including mechanical stimuli allows researchers to mimic native vessel behaviour in health and disease. We discuss the primary methods used to form blood vessel models and their limitations and conclude with an outlook on how blood vessel models that incorporate patient-specific cells and flows can be used in the future for personalised disease modelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.