Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33651825›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

National noncommunicable disease monitoring survey (NNMS) in India: Estimating risk factor prevalence in adult population.

Prashant Mathur, Vaitheeswaran Kulothungan, Sravya Leburu, Anand Krishnan, Himanshu Kumar Chaturvedi, Harshal Ramesh Salve, Ritvik Amarchand, Baridalyne Nongkynrih, P Ganesh Kumar, Vinay Urs K S and 26 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Recent studies on hypertension prevalence and control in India 2023.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

36 authors.

Prashant MathurIndian Council Medical Research-National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0002-9271-1373
Vaitheeswaran KulothunganIndian Council Medical Research-National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Sravya LeburuIndian Council Medical Research-National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Anand KrishnanCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Himanshu Kumar ChaturvediIndian Council Medical Research-National Institute of Medical Statistics, New Delhi, India.
Harshal Ramesh SalveCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Ritvik AmarchandCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
Baridalyne NongkynrihCentre for Community Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
P Ganesh KumarIndian Council Medical Research-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.ORCID 0000-0001-7466-7965
Vinay Urs K SIndian Council Medical Research-National Centre for Disease Informatics and Research, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Lakshmy RamakrishnanDepartment of Cardiac Biochemistry, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
A LaxmaiahDivision of Community Studies, Indian Council Medical Research-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Manjit BoruahDepartment of Community Medicine, Assam Medical College, Dibrugarh, Assam, India.
Sanjeev KumarDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2730-2378
Binod Kumar PatroDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0019-4522
Pankaja Ravi RaghavDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4209-3829
Prabu RajkumarIndian Council Medical Research-National Institute of Epidemiology, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
P Sankara SarmaAchutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Rinku SharmaCentre for Noncommunicable Diseases, National Centre for Disease Control, Directorate General of Health Services, New Delhi, India.
Muralidhar TambeDepartment of Community Medicine, B J Govt. Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
K R ThankappanDepartment of Public Health and Community Medicine, Central University Kerala, Kasaragod, Kerala, India.ORCID 0000-0002-4536-2684
N ArlappaDivision of Community Studies, Indian Council Medical Research-National Institute of Nutrition, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Tulika Goswami MahantaDepartment of Community Medicine/Prevention & Social Medicine, Tezpur Medical College, Tezpur, Assam, India.
Rajnish P JoshiDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Neeti RustagiDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Sonia GuptaCentre for Noncommunicable Diseases, National Centre for Disease Control, Directorate General of Health Services, New Delhi, India.
Binod Kumar BeheraDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8113-5289
Sangita Chandrakant ShelkeDepartment of Community Medicine, B J Govt. Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Abhiruchi GalhotraDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, India.
Pranab Jyoti BhuyanRegional Director Office, Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Guwahati, Assam, India.
Abhijit P PakhareDepartment of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Dewesh KumarDepartment of Preventive and Social Medicine, Rajendra Institute of Medical Sciences, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
Roshan K TopnoDepartment of Epidemiology, Indian Council Medical Research-Rajendra Memorial Research Institute of Medical Sciences, Patna, Bihar, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1412-7566
Manoj Kumar GuptaDepartment of Community Medicine and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.
Atulkumar V TrivediDepartment of Community Medicine, Government Medical College, Bhavnagar, Gujarat, India.
Suneela GargDepartment of Community Medicine, Maulana Azad Medical College and Associated Hospitals, New Delhi, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe primary objective of National NCD monitoring survey (NNMS) was to generate national-level estimates of key NCD indicators identified in the national NCD monitoring framework. This paper describes survey study protocol and prevalence of risk factors among adults (18-69 years). MATERIALS AND

methodsNNMS was a national level cross-sectional survey conducted during 2017-18. The estimated sample size was 12,000 households from 600 primary sampling units. One adult (18-69 years) per household was selected using the World Health Organization-KISH grid. The study tools were adapted from WHO-STEPwise approach to NCD risk factor surveillance, IDSP-NCD risk factor survey and WHO-Global adult tobacco survey. Total of 8/10 indicators of adult NCD risk factors according to national NCD disease monitoring framework was studied. This survey for the first time estimated dietary intake of salt intake of population at a national level from spot urine samples.

resultsTotal of 11139 households and 10659 adults completed the survey. Prevalence of tobacco and alcohol use was 32.8% (95% CI: 30.8-35.0) and 15.9% (95% CI: 14.2-17.7) respectively. More than one-third adults were physically inactive [41.3% (95% CI: 39.4-43.3)], majority [98.4% (95% CI: 97.8-98.8)] consumed less than 5 servings of fruits and / or vegetables per day and mean salt intake was 8 g/day (95% CI: 7.8-8.2). Proportion with raised blood pressure and raised blood glucose were 28.5% (95% CI: 27.0-30.1) and 9.3% (95% CI: 8.3-10.5) respectively. 12.8% (95% CI: 11.2-14.5) of adults (40-69 years) had ten-year CVD risk of ≥30% or with existing CVD.

conclusionNNMS was the first comprehensive national survey providing relevant data to assess India's progress towards targets in National NCD monitoring framework and NCD Action Plan. Established methodology and findings from survey would contribute to plan future state-based surveys and also frame policies for prevention and control of NCDs.

Indexed as

Surveys and QuestionnairesAdultAlcohol DrinkingBlood GlucoseCross-Sectional StudiesFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansIndiaMaleMiddle AgedNoncommunicable DiseasesRisk FactorsSmokingYoung AdultBlood Glucose

Identifiers

PMID33651825
PMCPMC7924800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.